On Sep 29, 2014, at 3:31 PM, David Lowe wrote:
> On 2014 Sep 29, at 1:38 PM, Alexander Hansen
> wrote:
>
>> It looks like you might have been reinventing the wheel:
>
> Silly me, i had thought that 'fink list rexx' && 'fink list regina' was
> sufficient due diligence. Should i assume
On 2014 Sep 29, at 1:38 PM, Alexander Hansen
wrote:
> It looks like you might have been reinventing the wheel:
Silly me, i had thought that 'fink list rexx' && 'fink list regina' was
sufficient due diligence. Should i assume that the reason the old package
wasn't brought forward was
On Sep 29, 2014, at 12:42 PM, David Lowe wrote:
> I'm attempting to package 'regina', which is an interpreter for the
> 'rexx' programming language. It's also my first info file from scratch.
> After solving a few build issues, the validator now complains about things i
> couldn't rea
