David Reiser wrote:
[]
> I've looked at this some more, and I think it's simpler. html-parser
> looks to me to be provided by both 5.8.6 and 5.8.8, but html-tree is
> provided by neither. Consequently, I think the fix is to delete line
> 339 of VirtPackage.pm so that html-tree does not appear
On Oct 19, 2008, at 4:51 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> David Reiser wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 18, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> []
>>> There is, however, also a "real" html-tree-pm588 package. Run
>>>
>>> fink install html-tree-pm588
>>>
>>> and see if this helps.
>>
>> That at least solve
David Reiser wrote:
>
> On Oct 18, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
[]
>> There is, however, also a "real" html-tree-pm588 package. Run
>>
>> fink install html-tree-pm588
>>
>> and see if this helps.
>
> That at least solves the building problem. Is there a workaround to
> force users
On Oct 18, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> David Reiser wrote:
>> How does fink 'know' what packages are provided?
>>
>> fink list html-tree gives (10.5.5 ppc):
>>
>> Information about 7253 packages read in 2 seconds.
>> html-tree-pm586 3.23-1 Handling informa
David Reiser wrote:
> How does fink 'know' what packages are provided?
>
> fink list html-tree gives (10.5.5 ppc):
>
> Information about 7253 packages read in 2 seconds.
> html-tree-pm586 3.23-1 Handling information
> from HTML syntax trees
> p html-tree-pm588
