On 18 Feb 2008, at 05:39, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
> does this indeed mean that there are no libs in the -nox version _
> that any other
> pkg's deps have to be on the main variant, (except if they use only
> the binaries ?)
the binary executables I meant ..
JF
---
On 18 Feb 2008, at 01:23, David R. Morrison wrote:
> I thought I would followup on this, since I know that imagemagick was
> one of the examples you had in mind.
>
> I couldn't find a way to get imagemagick to build binaries that
> enabled plugins, without also building the plugins (and hence dra
I thought I would followup on this, since I know that imagemagick was
one of the examples you had in mind.
I couldn't find a way to get imagemagick to build binaries that
enabled plugins, without also building the plugins (and hence dragging
in all the unwanted libraries to the build).
So w
On Jan 26, 2008, at 12:08 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
> Do we have any guideline or best-practices for how to structure
> (splitoffs, etc) a package that has plugins? By "plugins", I mean
> runtime-loaded modules or other components that can be removed without
> harming the overall program (other tha
