On Oct 21, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Alexander Hansen
wrote:
> On 10/21/12 10:40 AM, Scott Hannahs wrote:
>> I have a package (duplicity) that for some reason did not get moved to the
>> 10.8 tree.
>
> The reason would be that you didn't ask to have it done. :-) We haven't
> been moving things auto
On 10/21/12 10:40 AM, Scott Hannahs wrote:
> I have a package (duplicity) that for some reason did not get moved to the
> 10.8 tree.
The reason would be that you didn't ask to have it done. :-) We haven't
been moving things automatically, and so packages that nothing else
depend on can get lef
