Re: [Fink-devel] Re: prebinding

2003-02-08 Thread Benjamin Reed
On Saturday, February 8, 2003, at 11:27 PM, John Davidorff Pell wrote: uhhh.. So how do I tell it to give libabc the address 0x12345678 while keeping the executables at 0x? And that is one of the reasons all of fink isn't prebound yet. =) You will need to hack the Makefile.in for

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: prebinding

2003-02-08 Thread John Davidorff Pell
uhhh.. So how do I tell it to give libabc the address 0x12345678 while keeping the executables at 0x? JP On Saturday, February 8, 2003, at 08:07 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: On Saturday, February 8, 2003, at 10:56 PM, John Davidorff Pell wrote: -archive_cmds='$CC $(test .$mo

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: prebinding

2003-02-08 Thread John Davidorff Pell
I may be very very wrong, but i think that this simply built the lib with the address that it defaulted to. It gave no errors about it for "libintl.1.dylid" but many other binaries gave errors about conflicting w/ "libintl.1.dylid" The later packages also gave me errors about conflicting w/ "li

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: prebinding

2003-02-08 Thread Benjamin Reed
On Saturday, February 8, 2003, at 10:56 PM, John Davidorff Pell wrote: -archive_cmds='$CC $(test .$module = .yes && echo -bundle || echo -dynamiclib) $allow_undefined_flag -o $lib $libobjs $deplibs$linkopts -install_name $rpath/$soname $(test -n "$verstring" -a x$verstring != x0.0 && echo