Re: [Fink-devel] Running your own Binary Distribution Server

2005-06-03 Thread William Scott
This worked. Many thanks for the suggestion. > > You can make another directory http://xanana.ucsc.edu/fink-10.3 that > contains symlinks to everything in http://xanana.ucsc.edu/fink, > EXCEPT for 'dists' which should point to '10.3'. Then tell 10.3 users > to use the source 'deb http://xanana.u

Re: [Fink-devel] Running your own Binary Distribution Server

2005-06-02 Thread Charles Lepple
On 6/2/05, Robert M. Lefkowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If this is in fact the current state of Fink, I would be willing to > make an attempt to enhance fink to allow multiple source > repositories. Have you investigated the "Trees" line in fink.conf? ('man fink.conf' for details) I could be

Re: [Fink-devel] Running your own Binary Distribution Server

2005-06-02 Thread Benjamin Reed
Robert M. Lefkowitz wrote: > If this is in fact the current state of Fink, I would be willing to > make an attempt to enhance fink to allow multiple source repositories. > Is this something that would be viewed as helpful? Would anybody be > interested in working with me on this? Even better

Re: [Fink-devel] Running your own Binary Distribution Server

2005-06-02 Thread Robert M. Lefkowitz
I also set up a local binary distribution following these instructions -- but after some investigation, it seems that there is no way to have multiple source repositories. That is, apt supports the notion of multiple repositories -- which are all searched by apt.Fink, however, only pe

Re: [Fink-devel] Running your own Binary Distribution Server

2005-06-01 Thread David R. Morrison
On Jun 1, 2005, at 1:40 AM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote: On Jun 1, 2005, at 1:27 AM, William Scott wrote: I have do have separate repositories. So for this example ccp4 revision 200 is in 10.4 and revision 100 is in 10.3, and was built with 10.3. For whatever reason, the 10.3 user is only seei

Re: [Fink-devel] Running your own Binary Distribution Server

2005-05-31 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Jun 1, 2005, at 1:40 AM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote: On Jun 1, 2005, at 1:27 AM, William Scott wrote: I have do have separate repositories. So for this example ccp4 revision 200 is in 10.4 and revision 100 is in 10.3, and was built with 10.3. F

Re: [Fink-devel] Running your own Binary Distribution Server

2005-05-31 Thread Martin Costabel
Dave Vasilevsky wrote: [] You can make another directory http://xanana.ucsc.edu/fink-10.3 that contains symlinks to everything in http://xanana.ucsc.edu/fink, EXCEPT for 'dist' which should point to '10.3'. Then tell 10.3 users to use the source 'deb http://xanana.ucsc.edu/fink-10.3 stable m

Re: [Fink-devel] Running your own Binary Distribution Server

2005-05-31 Thread Dave Vasilevsky
On Jun 1, 2005, at 1:27 AM, William Scott wrote: I have do have separate repositories. So for this example ccp4 revision 200 is in 10.4 and revision 100 is in 10.3, and was built with 10.3. For whatever reason, the 10.3 user is only seeing the 10.4 tree, even though the 10.3 stuff is also pr

Re: [Fink-devel] Running your own Binary Distribution Server

2005-05-31 Thread William Scott
> Every Fink package has a dependency on the version of the kernel it > was built with, for technical reasons. This means that if you want to > have both 10.3 and 10.4-transitional users using the same apt > repository, you have to build the packages with 10.3. (It may be > possible to make Tiger

Re: [Fink-devel] Running your own Binary Distribution Server

2005-05-31 Thread Dave Vasilevsky
On May 31, 2005, at 11:36 PM, William Scott wrote: ccp4: Depends: ccp4lib (>= 5.0.2-200) but it is not going to be installed Depends: ccp4lib-shlibs (>= 5.0.2-200) but it is not going to be installed Depends: darwin (>= 8-1) but 7.7.2-1 is to be installed Every Fink pack

Re: [Fink-devel] Running your own Binary Distribution Server

2005-05-31 Thread Dave Vasilevsky
On May 31, 2005, at 8:19 PM, William Scott wrote: Users who are still on 10.3.x cannot access my debian packages in the 10.3 trees. Is there anything different they should put in their /sw/etc/apt/sources.list files or is there anything I can do on the server side to make this work for th

Re: [Fink-devel] Running your own Binary Distribution Server

2005-05-31 Thread David R. Morrison
Bill, I'm not sure how old those instructions are, but a few things have changed. First, be sure that people trying to use this are putting their modifications either at the very top or very bottom of the /sw/etc/apt/sources.list file. (The middle sections of this file get rewritten from time to