At 10:48 Uhr -0500 21.03.2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
>Oh wait, I can answer my own question by looking at the scripts in
>/sw/are/lib/dpkg/info. They are indeed /bin/sh and it looks like it
>was fink that make them thay way.
>
>So for consistency, I agree.
>
>By the way, there is an old commen
Oh wait, I can answer my own question by looking at the scripts in
/sw/are/lib/dpkg/info. They are indeed /bin/sh and it looks like it
was fink that make them thay way.
So for consistency, I agree.
By the way, there is an old comment of chrisp's in the docs which hints
that he was planning to s
What does dpkg use to execute prerm etc. scripts? Also /bin/sh?
-- Dave
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
no this is fine by me and I think it's a great idea.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>In fact so far I believe we'd always use /bin/sh, but we definitily
>don't. For the sake of a unified environment, and to reduce problems
>(as the one in the qt-3.0.2-1 package which wouldn't build for tcsh
>users)
