On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 23:54:42 +0200, Max Horn wrote:
>
> Am 22.04.2011 um 23:23 schrieb "Daniel Macks" :
>
> > On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 17:12:20 -0400, Daniel Macks wrote:
> > We've long had xft2-dev and fontconfig2-dev keep their headers and
> > libraries buried in subdirs so that they do not mask s
Am 22.04.2011 um 23:23 schrieb "Daniel Macks" :
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 17:12:20 -0400, Daniel Macks wrote:
> We've long had xft2-dev and fontconfig2-dev keep their headers and
> libraries buried in subdirs so that they do not mask system (x11)
> supplied versions of those same packages. [...]
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 17:12:20 -0400, Daniel Macks wrote:
We've long had xft2-dev and fontconfig2-dev keep their headers and
libraries buried in subdirs so that they do not mask system (x11)
supplied versions of those same packages. [...]
> Is it time to unbury these libraries?
Along the same "ge
