Committed to master the removal of "...and also has shared library"
from the "requires BDO if has header" test:
https://github.com/fink/fink/commit/8d5b4554e5f502ff8db6a693972d0810cf78cf9e
It's catching a bunch of ones that look legitimately broken to me
(static-only libs with no BDO) and I don
Sounds good to me...
-- Dave
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 24, 2012, at 4:24 PM, "Daniel Macks" wrote:
> I think that this is exactly one of the cases we should be rooting out
> (and that we are not currently able to detect). We do still have some
> packages that are static-only libraries and
I think that this is exactly one of the cases we should be rooting out
(and that we are not currently able to detect). We do still have some
packages that are static-only libraries and maybe some executables, and
especially if also executables other packages tend to Depends on them.
That makes
My recollection of the original idea was that there might be a package with
binaries, static libs, and headers all together. I dont know if there are any
such left, but if there are, they will need to be splitoffized to separate the
binaries (should this change be made).
-- Dave
Sent from m
