Re: [Fink-devel] new perl modules

2002-04-07 Thread Max Horn
At 8:17 Uhr -0400 07.04.2002, David R. Morrison wrote: > > what is foo.dev? i've never heard of a .dev file...just curious. > >It was a typo for foo.deb . > >You can run "fink validate" on a .deb file and it will warn you about things >that have been placed in non-policy-compliant locations. Jus

Re: [Fink-devel] new perl modules

2002-04-07 Thread David R. Morrison
> what is foo.dev? i've never heard of a .dev file...just curious. It was a typo for foo.deb . You can run "fink validate" on a .deb file and it will warn you about things that have been placed in non-policy-compliant locations. -- Dave ___ Fink-de

Re: [Fink-devel] new perl modules

2002-04-06 Thread Benjamin Reed
David R. Morrison [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > Any new packages that you write, or updates to packages that you maintain, > are fine to check in to the unstable directory. The important things > to keep in mind about CVS are: (1) nothing goes to stable until it has > been throughly tested by othe

Re: [Fink-devel] new perl modules

2002-04-06 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, April 6, 2002, at 10:28 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: ... > (3) check to make sure that the things you > are committing comply with fink's various policies. "fink validate > foo.info" > and "fink validate foo.dev" are very handy tools

Re: [Fink-devel] new perl modules

2002-04-06 Thread David R. Morrison
Any new packages that you write, or updates to packages that you maintain, are fine to check in to the unstable directory. The important things to keep in mind about CVS are: (1) nothing goes to stable until it has been throughly tested by other users, (2) except for immediately-committed bugfixe