Re: [Fink-devel] xmame-0.69.1-1

2010-09-03 Thread Dan Stephenson
On Sep 2, 2010, at Sep 2, 2010 12:06 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > It looks like the most recent version of xmame upstream is from > 2003, so > patching it to work on current Intel Macs may not be worth the trouble > (unless somebody is willing to devote the time to do that). > > You might tr

Re: [Fink-devel] xmame-0.69.1-1

2010-09-02 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9/1/10 10:12 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 8/31/10 10:18 PM, Dan Stephenson wrote: > >> On Aug 31, 2010, at Aug 31, 2010 9:15 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > >> On 8/31/10 9:42 PM, Dan Stephenson wrote: > $ xmame > error: compiled byte

Re: [Fink-devel] xmame-0.69.1-1

2010-09-01 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 8/31/10 10:18 PM, Dan Stephenson wrote: > > On Aug 31, 2010, at Aug 31, 2010 9:15 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On 8/31/10 9:42 PM, Dan Stephenson wrote: $ xmame error: compiled byte ordering doesn't match machine byte ordering

Re: [Fink-devel] xmame-0.69.1-1

2010-09-01 Thread Dan Stephenson
On Aug 31, 2010, at Aug 31, 2010 9:15 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 8/31/10 9:42 PM, Dan Stephenson wrote: >> $ xmame >> error: compiled byte ordering doesn't match machine byte ordering >> are you sure you choose the right arch? >> compile

Re: [Fink-devel] xmame-0.69.1-1

2010-08-31 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 8/31/10 9:42 PM, Dan Stephenson wrote: > $ xmame > error: compiled byte ordering doesn't match machine byte ordering > are you sure you choose the right arch? > compiled for msb-first, are you sure you choose the right cpu in > makefile.unix > >

Re: [Fink-devel] xmame-0.69.1-1

2008-12-09 Thread Martin Costabel
Alexander Hansen wrote: [] > It appears that this package misbuilds on Intel Macs (at least on mine > and the one used to build our binary distribution), and that you're > the first one to report it to us. The same behavior occurs for > xmame-0.71.1-1 in current/unstable as well. The one in

Re: [Fink-devel] xmame-0.69.1-1

2008-12-09 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Dec 9, 2008, at 9:37 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On Dec 8, 2008, at 6:20 PM, Mark Brodwin wrote: > >> dhcp-3-170:~% xmame >> error: compiled byte ordering doesn't match machine byte ordering >> are you sure you choose the right arch? >> compiled for msb-first, are you sure you choose the r

Re: [Fink-devel] xmame-0.69.1-1

2008-12-09 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Dec 8, 2008, at 6:20 PM, Mark Brodwin wrote: > dhcp-3-170:~% xmame > error: compiled byte ordering doesn't match machine byte ordering > are you sure you choose the right arch? > compiled for msb-first, are you sure you choose the right cpu in > makefile.unix > > > -- > Package manager version

Re: [Fink-devel] xmame-0.69.1-1

2005-10-03 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 9/30/05, Scott Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I got Xmame 0.100 to build on this version of os would love to help > with getting it added. > > -- > Package manager version: 0.24.10 > Distribution version: 0.8.0.rsync > Mac OS X version: 10.4.2 > Xcode version: 2.1 > gcc version: 4.0.0 (Appl