On Wednesday, May 15, 2002, at 11:50 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
As a test I added:
-j `hostinfo | grep processors | tail -n1 | sed -e
's/^.*,[[:space:]]\([[:digit:]]*\)[[:space:]]processors.*$/\1/'`
just after the make command in the glib2 package and gnome-core
package (i had to add the
At 2:42 Uhr -0400 16.05.2002, Jeremy Erwin wrote:
On Wednesday, May 15, 2002, at 11:50 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
As a test I added:
-j `hostinfo | grep processors | tail -n1 | sed -e
's/^.*,[[:space:]]\([[:digit:]]*\)[[:space:]]processors.*$/\1/'`
just after the make command in the glib2 package
[...]
You say a lot up there, just one thing: I understand your
disappointment with the problems in the evolution package, but I
think you picked a rather bad example there. I was reluctant to even
put the package into unstable, and nearly didn't do it, wasn't it for
various people that
Hi there,
since upgrading to fink 0.9.12-1, I get the following messages when
running fink:
Use of uninitialized value in numeric gt () at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Package.pm line 377.
and
Use of uninitialized value in numeric gt () at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Package.pm line
377, SW_VERS line 2.
Is
At 13:45 Uhr +0200 16.05.2002, Bernd Kuemmerlen wrote:
Hi there,
since upgrading to fink 0.9.12-1, I get the following messages when
running fink:
Use of uninitialized value in numeric gt () at
/sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Package.pm line 377.
and
Use of uninitialized value in numeric gt () at
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Max Horn wrote:
At 13:45 Uhr +0200 16.05.2002, Bernd Kuemmerlen wrote:
Hi there,
since upgrading to fink 0.9.12-1, I get the following messages when
running fink:
Use of uninitialized value in numeric gt () at
/sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Package.pm line 377.
and
Use of
Bernd Kuemmerlen wrote:
Use of uninitialized value in numeric gt () at
/sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Package.pm line 377.
I remember having had this for a while, too. It went away, maybe after
doing a fink index or some other standard operation (like selfupdate
or update-all). I thought it was coming
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Bernd Kuemmerlen wrote:
Use of uninitialized value in numeric gt () at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Package.pm line
377, SW_VERS line 2.
Out of curiosity, what does line 377 of that file look like for you? What
is being evaluated there that Perl doesn't like in this context? My
Just one remark on Marks comments (which I think are OK, and fink is
going fast in the direction he wants)
Mark Rahner wrote:
[]
I'm also aware how important it is that these packages be tested. The
build-from-source hurdle alone will significantly reduce the number of
folks who use these
Hi all. I was just compiling a package from unstable, and I got
make: gcc: Command not found
How could this happen, you may wonder? My guess is that the package maintainer
has the April Dev Tools installed, and so gcc is present on his system
(invoking gcc2).
This is just a heads up to watch
on 5/6/02 9:06 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
libpq.so.2.1 seems to be a bundle, not a shared library
snip
libtool gives these errors because it cannot find a dylib
version of the library to link against, you can tell it not to
check, by editing configure, and changing the
David R. Morrison wrote:
Hi all. I was just compiling a package from unstable, and I got
make: gcc: Command not found
This is sometimes hard to eliminate (I should know, because you forced
me to do it a couple of times :-)). The implicit suffix rules .c.o,
for example, use gcc in gnumake
On Thursday, May 16, 2002, at 05:47 AM, Max Horn wrote:
And don't forget that only people who actually have dual-processor
systems can test these modified build scripts. Thus, I won't add such
code to my packages (those that use GNU make anyway, which are not
all), because I would have
At 10:45 Uhr -0400 16.05.2002, Chris Devers wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Bernd Kuemmerlen wrote:
Use of uninitialized value in numeric gt () at
/sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Package.pm line 377, SW_VERS line 2.
Out of curiosity, what does line 377 of that file look like for you? What
is being evaluated
OK, sorry for the trouble, it seems I had some dangling softlinks in
/sw/fink/dists/local/main/finkinfo which pointed to unstable packages
which were no longer available (at least I think this was the problem,
because after cleaning up the local tree, everything is back to normal.
Thanks anyway
where should main-pages be kept - in /sw/share/man - isn't it?
i found that in some packages the man pages are in /sw/man - is this
correct???
for example:
the man-pages in xtail are in the wrong directory:
[titan:/] root# dpkg --contents
/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-
i want to port graphviz to fink. - But i get a compile error really late
in the build process ...
i have tried to compile/link with -undefined suppress -flat_namespace
and -undefined error -twofold_namespace - both give the same error -
when i remove -dynamiclib from the marked instruction
17 matches
Mail list logo
