>Daniel Macks wrote:
>
>> The 'fink checksums' mode was added two years ago when we first
>> started requiring MD5 for source tarballs. The code implementing it is
>> marked:
>>
>> # HACK HACK HACK
>> # This is to be removed soon again, only a temporary tool to allow
>> # checking of all avai
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 16:37, Martin Costabel wrote:
> It is a pity that the symptom is doctored instead of telling the guy on
> #fink to fix his broken Stuffit Pro. There was never (well, apart from
> the short period while we tried to find the reason for the failure) any
> reason to deprecate
Another place I don't remember to look... =)
BTW, I thought Sao's pages were supposed to be incorporated into
Fink's
web site?
Yeah, I thought so too, dunno what happened...
Cut me some slack--I'm supposed to review them for obsolete material,
but I haven't had time.
--
Alexander K. Hansen
Fin
By which I mean "It's under review." ;-)
On Aug 13, 2004, at 9:18 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Another place I don't remember to look... =)
BTW, I thought Sao's pages were supposed to be incorporated into
Fink's
web site?
Yeah, I thought so too, dunno what happened...
Cut me some slack--I'm s
I'm the maintainer for figlet, dclib0, dcgui-qt, dclib0-ssl, &
dcgui-qt-ssl. I've gotten a number of positive feedback on the 5 packages
and would like to have them in stable.
For future reference, what's prefered for a request like this: a post to
fink-devel or a new tracker item at sf.net?
On Aug 13, 2004, at 1:36 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/sci
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv9005
Modified Files:
roofitcore.info roofitcore.patch roofitmodels.info
roofitmodels.patch
Log Message:
Promote to stabl
Hi Dave,
Yep, will happen shortly.
Cheers,
Remi
On Aug 13, 2004, at 11:05 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
On Aug 13, 2004, at 1:36 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/sci
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv9005
Modified Fil
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 12:51:11PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Daniel Macks wrote:
> >
> >> The 'fink checksums' mode was added two years ago when we first
> >> started requiring MD5 for source tarballs.
[...]
> >> Does anyone still use this mode? Do we still need this
> >> functionality
Am 13.08.2004 um 20:41 schrieb Daniel Macks:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 12:51:11PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Macks wrote:
The 'fink checksums' mode was added two years ago when we first
started requiring MD5 for source tarballs.
[...]
Does anyone still use this mode? Do we still need this
