Hi,
A user reported this error for the emboss package that I maintain.
Anyone has a clue what could be the problem?
thanks,
- Koen.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Guy Lauquin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: August 19, 2004 9:23:47 AM EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: emboss compilation failed
Dear Ko
Koen van der Drift wrote:
Hi,
A user reported this error for the emboss package that I maintain.
Anyone has a clue what could be the problem?
[]
a lot of warnings like this:
Forget the warnings.
[]
mkdir /sw/src/root-emboss-2.9.0-3/sw/share/EMBOSS/jemboss/org/emboss/
jemboss/editor
install: *.
Is there a way to get the dependency engine to accept a specific version
of another package but wildcard the revision field when searching? For
example, I want Package A to depend on Package B-0.3.3, but I don't care
what revision of Package B (eg 0.3.3-1 and 0.3.3-7 are OK, but 0.3.4-1 is
no
I see several packages have constructs like:
Depends: openssl-shlibs | openssl097-shlibs
BuildDepends: openssl-dev | openssl097-dev
This is not correct--if, for example, one has openssl097-dev installed
at build-time, then one *must* have openssl097-shlibs at run-time
(openssl-shlibs will not
I am trying to get the most recent source for "xcircuit" (3.2.23) to
run, so that hopefully the Fink package can be updated to a more
recent version. (xcircuit is a schematic entry / drawing program.)
In brief, I *seem* to be running into a problem with libtool. During
the final link stage I
netpbm 10.24-1 doesn't compile under Xcode 1.5
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Fre
Daniel,
I have only tested this on one machine but it seems the current fink
in 10.3 (0.21.2-1) breaks upgrading fftw/fftw-shlibs to fink-mpi/
fink-mpi-shlibs with the following comands...
fink install fftw
fink install fftw-mpi
Now the installation of fftw-mpi fails with...
/usr/bin/sudo /
vnc4.0rel-22 won't build, as it is looking for a wrongly named
tarball. Fink is looking for vnc-4.0rel-unixsrc.tar.gz, but the name
should be vnc-4.0-unixsrc.tar.gz, i.e. no "rel" in the middle of the
name.
I reported it to the maintainer, but he tells me that his update to
vnc has been stuck
It's been fixed this time.
Tracker, huh? I need to look at that more often.
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, Kevin Horton wrote:
vnc4.0rel-22 won't build, as it is looking for a wrongly named tarball. Fink
is looking for vnc-4.0rel-unixsrc.tar.gz, but the name should be
vnc-4.0-unixsrc.tar.gz, i.e. no "rel"
Steve Dieringer wrote:
netpbm 10.24-1 doesn't compile under Xcode 1.5
How so?
--
Martin
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Reta
Hi Dale,
Have you tried passing -Wl,-bind_at_load ? By the way, if you pass -v
-v to gcc, it will show you the libtool and ld commands it's running,
so you can examine what's going wrong.
Dave
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Am 23.08.2004 um 18:33 schrieb Steve Dieringer:
netpbm 10.24-1 doesn't compile under Xcode 1.5
Hmm, got Xcode 1.5 installed and netpbm 10.24-1 rebuild without
problems.
gecko
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on B
On Aug 23, 2004, at 10:33 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
Is there a way to get the dependency engine to accept a specific
version of another package but wildcard the revision field when
searching?
Hi Hanspeter,
For my Galeon package I have to depend on a specific major version of
Mozilla, e
On Aug 23, 2004, at 4:38 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Steve Dieringer wrote:
netpbm 10.24-1 doesn't compile under Xcode 1.5
How so?
--
Martin
Here's what I get. BTW, if it matters, I had the 'recalled' version of
fink installed for a while. Since reverted per message on web site.
But this is sub
Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
On Aug 23, 2004, at 10:33 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
Is there a way to get the dependency engine to accept a specific
version of another package but wildcard the revision field when
searching?
Hi Hanspeter,
For my Galeon package I have to depend on a specific majo
Am 23.08.2004 um 20:52 schrieb Steve Dieringer:
ld: warning prebinding disabled because of undefined symbols
ld: Undefined symbols:
_pm_seek2
_pm_tell2
make[2]: *** [pnmtopng] Error 1
make[1]: *** [other/all] Error 2
make: *** [converter/all] Error 2
### execution of make failed, exit code 2
Failed
Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
Von: Steve Dieringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Datum: 23. August 2004 21:49:57 GMT+00:00
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [Fink-devel] XCode issue
Here's what I get:
Welcome to Darwin!
[Banshee:~] steved% nm /sw/src/netpbm10-10.24-1/netpbm-10.24/lib/libnetpbm.10
On Aug 23, 2004, at 11:58 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
I see several packages have constructs like:
Depends: openssl-shlibs | openssl097-shlibs
BuildDepends: openssl-dev | openssl097-dev
This is not correct--if, for example, one has openssl097-dev installed
at build-time, then one *must* have openss
On Aug 23, 2004, at 5:21 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Depends: mozilla (>= 1.7-1), mozilla (<< 1.8-1)
Did you actually try this? And did it do what you thought it should
do? In my tests, when it was like you show it, it happily neglected
the second dependency and installed the higher version anyway
On Aug 23, 2004, at 6:21 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
On Aug 23, 2004, at 11:58 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
I see several packages have constructs like:
Depends: openssl-shlibs | openssl097-shlibs
BuildDepends: openssl-dev | openssl097-dev
I apologize; I completely misread this message the first ti
On Aug 23, 2004, at 5:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ld: warning prebinding disabled because of undefined symbols
ld: Undefined symbols:
_pm_seek2
_pm_tell2
make[2]: *** [pnmtopng] Error 1
make[1]: *** [other/all] Error 2
make: *** [converter/all] Error 2
### execution of make failed, exit code 2
Am 23.08.2004 um 21:55 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Here's what I get:
Welcome to Darwin!
[Banshee:~] steved% nm
/sw/src/netpbm10-10.24-1/netpbm-10.24/lib/libnetpbm.10.24.dylib | grep
_pm_tell2
2ed4 T _pm_tell2
[Banshee:~] steved%
[Banshee:~] steved% nm
/sw/src/netpbm10-10.24-1/netpbm-10.24/li
Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
On Aug 23, 2004, at 5:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ld: warning prebinding disabled because of undefined symbols
ld: Undefined symbols:
_pm_seek2
_pm_tell2
make[2]: *** [pnmtopng] Error 1
make[1]: *** [other/all] Error 2
make: *** [converter/all] Error 2
### execution of ma
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 01:13:34AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
> >On Aug 23, 2004, at 5:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >>>ld: warning prebinding disabled because of undefined symbols
> >>>ld: Undefined symbols:
> >>>_pm_seek2
> >>>_pm_tell2
> >>>make[2]: *** [pnmto
Daniel Macks wrote:
[]
I wonder if when linking against that .dylib the linker is picking
/sw/lib/libnetpbm.dylib instead of the one just compiled as part of
the nascent package?
I don't think this happens in this case. The package goes to some
lengths to avoid this, -isystem and such. The actual
Martin Costabel wrote:
Daniel Macks wrote:
[]
I wonder if when linking against that .dylib the linker is picking
/sw/lib/libnetpbm.dylib instead of the one just compiled as part of
the nascent package?
I don't think this happens in this case. The package goes to some
lengths to avoid this, -isyst
26 matches
Mail list logo
