Re: [Fink-devel] ion

2005-02-04 Thread Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 02:07:15AM -0500, John Nowak wrote: > Just wanted to let you know that Ion is working fine on my system. > > Installed on Feb 3, 2005. > > Powerbook G4 1.25GHz > OS 10.3.8 > > No hassles with compilation whatsoever. > Thanks for letting me know. I have found that OpenG

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink PkgVersion.pm,1.351,1.352 ChangeLog,1.842,1.843

2005-02-04 Thread Ben Hines
All of fink needs to be built with this patch before releasing this. We've never audited this policy, my guess is a lot of stuff will break. -Ben On Feb 3, 2005, at 10:29 AM, TheSin wrote: Also this needs to be docu'd and a policy for this needs to be made. Lots of perlmods don't comply to this

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink PkgVersion.pm,1.351,1.352 ChangeLog,1.842,1.843

2005-02-04 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 04 Feb 2005, at 23:03, Ben Hines wrote: All of fink needs to be built with this patch before releasing this. We've never audited this policy, my guess is a lot of stuff will break. If I understand correctly, this means we start implementing Max Horn's old proposal to really distinguish RunTi

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink PkgVersion.pm,1.351,1.352 ChangeLog,1.842,1.843

2005-02-04 Thread Martin Costabel
Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 04 Feb 2005, at 23:03, Ben Hines wrote: All of fink needs to be built with this patch before releasing this. We've never audited this policy, my guess is a lot of stuff will break. If I understand correctly, this means we start implementing Max Horn's old proposal

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink PkgVersion.pm,1.351,1.352 ChangeLog,1.842,1.843

2005-02-04 Thread TheSin
all -shlibs won't be needed, there will be a new policy (which was a silent one anyhow) that all -dev pkgs must depend on their -shlibs like foo-shlibs (= %v-%r). Now this is true for most shlibs anyhow so indirectly -dev builddeps means -dev and shlibs, the reason we need to change that I hav

[Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink PkgVersion.pm,1.351,1.352 ChangeLog,1.842,1.843

2005-02-04 Thread Daniel E. Macks
Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Jean-François Mertens wrote: >> >> On 04 Feb 2005, at 23:03, Ben Hines wrote: >> >>> All of fink needs to be built with this patch before releasing this. >>> We've never audited this policy, my guess is a lot of stuff will break. >> >> If I understand

[Fink-devel] Re: Bug ID 3978724: Cups headers are not included

2005-02-04 Thread Ben Hines
They lie. Perhaps they are there on tiger? They aren't on panther, even with the dev tools installed. -Ben On Feb 4, 2005, at 8:54 PM, John T. Shaw wrote: I asked a little while back about the cups headers in Mac OS. Interestingly enough I got a response that said the headers are included in a "