Just to clarify this a little, only comment out the depends and use
'fink build' for testing, make sure you don't commit the pkg with the
depends commented, they are still needed for install and run time.
This is just to test that all pkgs can build without the depends line.
---
TS
http://south
I've been trying to make a package for aee, and I've run into the
following problem. As stated in the packaging manual, I ran the
following diff command and got a pretty standard patch file. I needed
to make the patch because the path to the help.ae file is hard coded in
the source file.
> d
With the upcoming shlibs change, the packaging engine needs to be
changed a little and this will break many packages.
first let me explain the shlibs change. Basically fink will beable to
automatically insert all share library deps to the Depends line by
using Depends: {SHLIB_DEPS}, curl | cur
Le 5 févr. 2005, à 17:01, TheSin a écrit :
Anyhow, any maintainer wishing to help us out and help speed this new
great tool up for us, please follow this next set of instructions to
fix your pkgs:
all pkgs such be able fink build foo with out the depends line so
comment it out and add what is n
Please make the changes that need be made to builddeps and shlibs
fields and committed them to cvs. None of these changes will break pkgs
in fink current state. Fink will only break in the next state if these
changes have not been made.
As for variation. At this point will no longer be interc
Le 5 févr. 2005, à 17:41, TheSin a écrit :
As for variation. At this point will no longer be interchangeable.
This may only be temporary.
OK, but how to treat them?
Is this true only for -shlibs, or also for -dev or any other imaginable
splitoff?
For example in glade2, there are a choice betwe
BuildDepends: and Depends can still have | fields like
pango1-dev | pango1-xft2-dev
it's only the Shlibs fields for now that we ask only have one pkg name.
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 5-Feb-05, at 10:59 AM, Michèle Garoche wrote:
Le
Why not make 'fink build' ignore the depends line completely in all
cases?
-Ben
On Feb 5, 2005, at 7:30 AM, TheSin wrote:
Just to clarify this a little, only comment out the depends and use
'fink build' for testing, make sure you don't commit the pkg with the
depends commented, they are still n
in the new engine it will, but we are trying to prep everyone before we
break alot of pkgs.
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 5-Feb-05, at 12:02 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
Why not make 'fink build' ignore the depends line completely in all
ca
1 - Would it be possible to move libncurses5w to 10.3 stable? I need it
in a package for additional feature.
2 - Is readline5 the future of readline? i.e. is it conceived to
replace readline in a near future as that was the case for libncurses5?
To put it brief, would it be better I Depends, Bu
Patrick:
A month ago I tried to compile planner on my Mac. I began to realize
that I am in way over my head. Today I tried again and found your
posting on gmane.os.apple.fink.beginners. I had already done the cvs
update from :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/gnome (the cvs in
your message did
11 matches
Mail list logo
