On Apr 4, 2005, at 12:20 AM, Daniel E. Macks wrote:
David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
One open question is whether to implement a new G++-ABI field in fink
packages (which would override the default version number) or whether
to stick with the existing GCC field as the signal for whether
I've begun the implementation of the new license policy by re-licensing
all of the packages that Lars listed in the stable/crypto category,
re-licensing them in all four active trees. (I made them all Restrictive,
but put a note in DescPackaging to indicate the original license.) I'll
work on t
Benjamin Reed wrote:
+1
I think public domain is a good idea for such things.
Public domain doesn't do things like disclaim liability. I suggest the
MIT X11 license instead:
Copyright (c)
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
copy of this software and associat
--
Package manager version: 0.23.6
Distribution version: 0.7.1.rsync
Mac OS X version: 10.3.8
December 2001 Developer Tools
gcc version: 3.3
make version: 3.79
Feedback Courtesy of FinkCommander
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guid
The package 'openldap-ssl' will be built and installed.
The package 'openldap-ssl-shlibs' will be built and installed.
The following package will be installed or updated:
openldap-ssl
The following additional package will be installed:
openldap-ssl-shlibs
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
dpkg-deb -
I've been trying to get every Fink package building with GCC 4 on
Tiger. Attached are patches for gnomelibs, libnessus, and libnessus-
ssl. Let me know if I can help with anything! The libnessus patch
will also apply to libnessus-ssl.
--
Matthew Sachs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [AIM:MattSachs]
Co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David R. Morrison wrote:
> I've begun the implementation of the new license policy by re-licensing
> all of the packages that Lars listed in the stable/crypto category,
> re-licensing them in all four active trees. (I made them all Restrictive,
> but
