I have not yet been able to update to the latest fink-0.24.5-21 on 10.4
unstable. I am getting the same error as the one Cian Hughes reported to
the fink-seed list on April 15 and on April 29, see below.
He then claimed to have found that this was caused by a broken sudoers
file. In my case, I
Cian Hughes wrote:
Martin, you would be surprised what problems can be caused by your
sudoers file,
[]
# User privilege specification
rootALL=(ALL) ALL
%admin ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL
OK, I see now what is different: I had copied my /etc/sudoers from
Panther to Tiger, and this has the last li
Martin, you would be surprised what problems can be caused by your sudoers file,in order for the aforementioned test to function your mac must allow the user root to use sudo to execute that command as nobody,the error "Sorry, user root is not allowed to execute '/bin/sh -c /var/tmp/tmp.0.uhk843'
While trying to build nessus-ssl, I came across an interesting
problem with libdnet. The root of the problem is
10.4-transitional/stable libdnet installs the shlibs as
libdnet-shlibs and unstable installs them as libdnet1-shlibs
with no provides, or other compatibility tags. So, when I have
unst
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:18:17PM +1000, Daniel Wyeth wrote:
> On 07/05/2005, at 12:58 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> >
> >Just a small remark to this point: The {Pre,Post}{Inst,Rm}Scripts
> >already are always executed as a whole with a first line #!/bin/sh
> >thrown in by fink. After you insta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
we are working on this problem...
- ---
TS
http://southofheaven.org/
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 8-May-05, at 4:47 PM, Rob Braun wrote:
While trying to build nessus-ssl, I came across an interesting
problem with libdnet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
just a note, ruby18 (not sure about others) need to modify the
rbconfig.rb to force gcc-3.3, I just spent lots of time trying to
learn ruby just to find it it's been working for hours but I was
compiling with gcc4.0 and linking to 3.3 libs...
- --
On Apr 28, 2005, at 1:16 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Looks like some postgres things were rolled over, but now
we're missing libgeos2. Is that in unstable, and if so, should
it not already be promoted so that postgres8 can build?
Sorry for a slow reply. You might have noticed already that libgeo
On 2005-05-08, Rob Braun wrote:
> While trying to build nessus-ssl, I came across an interesting
> problem with libdnet. The root of the problem is
> 10.4-transitional/stable libdnet installs the shlibs as
> libdnet-shlibs and unstable installs them as libdnet1-shlibs
> with no provides, or other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yup that is the fix, you could use %v-%r though.
- ---
TS
http://southofheaven.org/
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 8-May-05, at 8:31 PM, Corey Halpin wrote:
On 2005-05-08, Rob Braun wrote:
While trying to build nessus-ssl,
On 2005-05-08, TheSin wrote:
> Yup that is the fix, you could use %v-%r though.
I've got a few things on my list to do with those packages. They're
going to have to wait until next week after Thursday. When I'm done taking
semester finals and also done presenting proposals for funding at work.
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 11:19:01AM +0200, "D. H?hn" wrote:
> Daniel Macks wrote:
>
> > For example:
> >
> > Package: foo-%type_raw[crypto]
> > Type: crypto (ssl tls)
> > License: (%type_raw[crypto] = ssl) Restrctive, GPL
> >
> > for a program "foo" that can use different crypto back-ends a
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 09:10:58PM -0700, Ehab Abunuwara wrote:
> the home page information is not valid anymore, unable
> to access.
I just updated the Homepage and Source.
> installation current but no idea how to run the program!
As with all fink packages type 'dpkg -L pkgname' to see a list
TheSin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yup that is the fix, you could use %v-%r though.
To me, the section in the unstable libdnet
SplitOff: <<
Package: %N1-shlibs
Conflicts: %N-shlibs
Replaces: %N (<< 1.5-2), %N-shlibs
looks very much in contradiction with Fink shlibs po
On 09/05/2005, at 9:39 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:18:17PM +1000, Daniel Wyeth wrote:
As a matter of interest, would it not be more consistent to execute
the Install Script as a single entity also, in the same way as the
Pre and Post Scripts in the deb are? Just a thought, a
Benjamin Reed wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
My question: What is planned for qt3 in 10.4/stable? In 10.3/stable,
the argument against having qt3-3.3.x (needed by scribus-1.2.1) was
that the kde version in stable needed the older qt3 version 3.2.2. Now
kde has not yet been put into 10.4-transitio
16 matches
Mail list logo
