> "Kevin" == Kevin Horton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kevin> To avoid such problems in the future, I wonder if fink could be made
Kevin> smart enough to recognize when it is installed on an OS version that
Kevin> is newer than it knows how to deal with. It could then post a message
Kevin> lik
I finished another Fink build over the weekend. A system
configuration error caused a lot of things to build with 3.3 instead
of 4.0, which introduced a lot of failures due to trying to link 3.3
against 4.0, so I won't be releasing a report on these results.
The good news is that this buil
In response to my Tiger patch for jzip, its maintainer has stated
that he doesn't have time for that package any more. Does anyone
here want to take it over or should I set it to "None " ?
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Intro
Hi Folks:
I've set up a binary distribution server following the directions
here: http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/advanced/bindist.php
I set this up while running 10.3.x and am now running 10.4.1.
Users who have 10.4.x experience no problems
Users who are still on 10.3.x cannot access my d
On 2005-05-30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> how do i add the newest version to fink commander i believe nessus
> is up to version 2.2.4
>
> --
> Package manager version: 0.23.8
http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-fink.php?phpLang=en#unstable
It appears that you're using a very old version
Bill,
I'm not sure how old those instructions are, but a few things have changed.
First, be sure that people trying to use this are putting their modifications
either at the very top or very bottom of the /sw/etc/apt/sources.list file.
(The middle sections of this file get rewritten from time to
On May 31, 2005, at 8:19 PM, William Scott wrote:
Users who are still on 10.3.x cannot access my debian packages in
the 10.3 trees. Is there anything different they should put in
their /sw/etc/apt/sources.list files or is there anything I can do
on the server side to make this work for th
Hi there,
this might not be a follow-up to the message below, but at least it's
the same ball park...
I've just updated firefox from 1.0 to 1.0.4 and I now get the following
error
---
/sw/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh: line 451: 24733 Bus error
"$prog" ${1+"$@"}
---
I've tried to recompile
Le 31 mai 2005 à 23:48, Matthew Sachs a écrit :[snip]The second build will use 10.4-transitional and not try to force 4.0, and will build the packages as 'nobody' instead of 'root'.That would be good, because I've begun on 27th May and only 1120 packages have been built at the time being mostly bec
On May 31, 2005, at 11:36 PM, William Scott wrote:
ccp4: Depends: ccp4lib (>= 5.0.2-200) but it is not going to be
installed
Depends: ccp4lib-shlibs (>= 5.0.2-200) but it is not going
to be installed
Depends: darwin (>= 8-1) but 7.7.2-1 is to be installed
Every Fink pack
On May 31, 2005, at 10:55 PM, Michèle Garoche wrote:Le 31 mai 2005 à 23:48, Matthew Sachs a écrit :The second build will use 10.4-transitional and not try to force 4.0, and will build the packages as 'nobody' instead of 'root'.That would be good, because I've begun on 27th May and only 1120 package
> Every Fink package has a dependency on the version of the kernel it
> was built with, for technical reasons. This means that if you want to
> have both 10.3 and 10.4-transitional users using the same apt
> repository, you have to build the packages with 10.3. (It may be
> possible to make Tiger
On Jun 1, 2005, at 1:27 AM, William Scott wrote:
I have do have separate repositories. So for this example ccp4
revision
200 is in 10.4 and revision 100 is in 10.3, and was built with 10.3.
For whatever reason, the 10.3 user is only seeing the 10.4 tree, even
though the 10.3 stuff is also pr
Le 1 juin 2005 à 06:52, Dave Vasilevsky a écrit :On May 31, 2005, at 10:55 PM, Michèle Garoche wrote:Le 31 mai 2005 à 23:48, Matthew Sachs a écrit :The second build will use 10.4-transitional and not try to force 4.0, and will build the packages as 'nobody' instead of 'root'.That would be good, bec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Matthew Sachs wrote:
This would let
> us validate submissions and automate the maintenance of the bindist
> (and even provide a bindist for unstable.)
>
While I like that very much, there is a trust/security issue here which
we have failed to
Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
[]
You can make another directory http://xanana.ucsc.edu/fink-10.3 that
contains symlinks to everything in http://xanana.ucsc.edu/fink, EXCEPT
for 'dist' which should point to '10.3'. Then tell 10.3 users to use
the source 'deb http://xanana.ucsc.edu/fink-10.3 stable m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jun 1, 2005, at 1:40 AM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
On Jun 1, 2005, at 1:27 AM, William Scott wrote:
I have do have separate repositories. So for this example ccp4
revision
200 is in 10.4 and revision 100 is in 10.3, and was built with 10.3.
F
17 matches
Mail list logo
