On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 08:39:00AM +0100, Mich?le Garoche wrote:
> Le 24 f?vr. 2006 ? 06:26, Daniel Johnson a ?crit :
> >
> >Anyway, the brand new libgnomeprint2.2-2.12.1-1001 package requires
> >a BuildDepends on bison. It fails to build with the system's
> >version. I assume the same is also
Le 24 févr. 2006 à 09:08, Daniel Macks a écrit :
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 08:39:00AM +0100, Mich?le Garoche wrote:
Le 24 f?vr. 2006 ? 06:26, Daniel Johnson a ?crit :
Anyway, the brand new libgnomeprint2.2-2.12.1-1001 package requires
a BuildDepends on bison. It fails to build with the system'
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 09:21:06AM +0100, Mich?le Garoche wrote:
>
> Le 24 f?vr. 2006 ? 09:08, Daniel Macks a ?crit :
>
> >On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 08:39:00AM +0100, Mich?le Garoche wrote:
> >>Le 24 f?vr. 2006 ? 06:26, Daniel Johnson a ?crit :
> >>>
> >>>Anyway, the brand new libgnomeprint2.2-2.12
Le 24 févr. 2006 à 09:53, Daniel Macks a écrit :
But seriously, we can't require of
ourselves a higher level of quality than the uptream authors
I think the contrary, if obviously a package does not work properly,
either it has not to be put in fink and bug reported to gnome, or it
has to b
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:25:14AM +0100, Mich?le Garoche wrote:
> Le 24 f?vr. 2006 ? 09:53, Daniel Macks a ?crit :
> >But seriously, we can't require of
> >ourselves a higher level of quality than the uptream authors
> I think the contrary, if obviously a package does not work properly,
> either
Le 24 févr. 2006 à 11:18, Daniel Macks a écrit :
. It seems
unlikely that an upstream package would have gone through a whole
unstable branch series then a new stable series and have serious
upgrade breakage or interface incompatibilities. So if they say
"it's
compatible", it's been tested b
Just for the record if it matters.
I've bootstrapped from HEAD in a new empty directory; bootstrapped
was fine: it installed gettext and its dependencies at version
0.10.40-19 on stable branch.
Then I've switched to unstable, removing stable directories in
fink.conf Trees line. Then selfc
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:26:43 -0500
Daniel Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, the brand new libgnomeprint2.2-2.12.1-1001 package requires
> a BuildDepends on bison. It fails to build with the system's version.
> I assume the same is also true in the other trees.
I have fink's bison insta
On 24 Feb 2006, at 14:53, Emily Jackson wrote:
gnome-print-ps2.c:43: ../libgnomeprint/gnome-font-private.h:67: error:
parse error before 'FT_Face' ../libgnomeprint/gnome-font-private.h:67:
The safe bet is to remove freetype or freetype-hinting during the build.
JF Mertens
-
Hi Michèle. I've seen things like this before. This kind of upgrade
issue is exactly why I haven't moved libgettext3 to stable. We need
to have a strategy for avoiding any issues with users who upgrade to
libgettext3.
Thanks for the report.
-- Dave
On Feb 24, 2006, at 3:00 AM, Michèl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 24, 2006, at 10:27 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Hi Michèle. I've seen things like this before. This kind of
upgrade issue is exactly why I haven't moved libgettext3 to
stable. We need to have a strategy for avoiding any issues with
us
Hi David,
Le 24 févr. 2006 à 16:27, David R. Morrison a écrit :
Hi Michèle. I've seen things like this before. This kind of
upgrade issue is exactly why I haven't moved libgettext3 to
stable. We need to have a strategy for avoiding any issues with
users who upgrade to libgettext3.
Yes,
Le 24 févr. 2006 à 16:49, Chris Zubrzycki a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 24, 2006, at 10:27 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Hi Michèle. I've seen things like this before. This kind of
upgrade issue is exactly why I haven't moved libgettext3 to
stable. We ne
I've been having some troubles with fink's fftw in 10.4. Yesterday,
when I invoked an optional build to make a private set of fftw
libraries within a package (ccp4-onlylibs-dev), my problems went
away. I just saw in the cvs tracker a new version of fftw with the
message "remove unneeded gc
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:22:26 +0100
Jean-François Mertens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 24 Feb 2006, at 14:53, Emily Jackson wrote:
>
> > gnome-print-ps2.c:43: ../libgnomeprint/gnome-font-private.h:67:
> > error: parse error before
> > 'FT_Face' ../libgnomeprint/gnome-font-private.h:67:
>
> The
This got bounced from the address
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host mail.sourceforge.net
[66.35.250.206]
said: 550 relay not permitted (in reply to RCPT TO command)
Date: February 24, 2006 11:41:08 AM PST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 10.4 (non-transitional) compile problem
Making install in d
William Scott wrote:
> This worked BTW when I manually changed g++ to g++-3.3
eek! that is not the proper fix, and will cause problems in the long
run. I will put out a proper fix when I have the time. :)
--
Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick
http://ranger.befunk.com/
-
This worked BTW when I manually changed g++ to g++-3.3
After this change, and the quick-and-dirty fix for gstreamer, the
remainder of bundle-kde-ssl bundle-kde-unified compiled on 10.4, fwiw.
Bill
Begin forwarded message:
From: William Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: February 23, 2006 10
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Benjamin Reed wrote:
William Scott wrote:
This worked BTW when I manually changed g++ to g++-3.3
eek! that is not the proper fix, and will cause problems in the long
run. I will put out a proper fix when I have the time. :)
I know.
I just did it locally in order
Le 24 févr. 2006 à 20:59, William Scott a écrit :
Using stylesheet: /sw/share/sgml/docbook/utils-0.6.14/docbook-
utils.dsl#print
Working on: /sw/src/fink.build/gstreamer-0.8.12-1021/
gstreamer-0.8.12/docs/faq/build/faq.xml
openjade:E: cannot open "/sw/share/sgml/xml.dcl" (No such file or
dir
I manually copied the file to the wrong location, and then it compiles, but
I think the package needs to be fixed.
May it would be better to change gstreamer info file or configuration, though
That's what I was suggesting. (It isn't my package; I'm just reporting a
compile failure.) That'
Le 24 févr. 2006 à 22:52, William Scott a écrit :
I manually copied the file to the wrong location, and then it
compiles, but I think the package needs to be fixed.
May it would be better to change gstreamer info file or
configuration, though
That's what I was suggesting. (It isn't my
Le 24 févr. 2006 à 22:52, William Scott a écrit :
I manually copied the file to the wrong location, and then it
compiles, but I think the package needs to be fixed.
May it would be better to change gstreamer info file or
configuration, though
That's what I was suggesting. (It isn't my
I noticed today when doing a 'fink selfupdate' and 'fink update-all'
from the 10.4-transitional unstable cvs a problem with the python packages.
I had both python23 and python24 installed on this machine so both packages
were to be updated with new builds. Unfortunately, while python24 now
buil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 24, 2006, at 9:59 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
I noticed today when doing a 'fink selfupdate' and 'fink update-
all'
from the 10.4-transitional unstable cvs a problem with the python
packages.
I had both python23 and python24 installed on t
Hi Baba. Actually, this change might not be a good idea. There is
no problem on the main site, but we also use this code on our remote
server pdb.finkproject.org. On that site, these menu items need to
point back to fink.sourceforge.net. So unless $root is going to get
defined there *no
26 matches
Mail list logo
