[Fink-devel] Fink Build Results

The latest build results, with Xcode 2.3, are up. It looks rather good; much of GNOME and KDE built on both architectures. g++ -force_flat_namespace doesn't work

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink Build Results

On May 30, 2006, at 17:19, Matthew Sachs wrote: > On May 30, 2006, at 16:53, Matthew Sachs wrote: > >> One issue for the world build is that a lot of things are blocked >> on ant. ant is a splitoff of ant-optional, which BuildDepends on >> stylebook. stylebook is on my skip list because it h

[Fink-devel] dpkg 10.4 and Xcode2.3

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Folks: I needed to make a fresh install of fink to test a package someone complained to me about, and (re)discovered that -force_flat_namespace prevents it from compiling, and then noted there was some concern about its behavior if that flag

Re: [Fink-devel] patch I found for fop, for Java 1.5

Le 29 mai 2006 à 04:11, Chuck Robey a écrit : I see you're listed as the maintainer for fop, so i will give you my experiences here. I couldn't get fop to build, after repeated tries. The error was listed as about 20 different problems with the sourcce code in fop itself. The first one

[Fink-devel] .so vs .dylib

This isn't necessarily a fink question, but it might get to be... A change was made in gnucash 1.9.7 where the program looks to load a .so module, but the compiler/linker only created .dylib files. The object in question is a Mach bundle. Creating a symlink x.so -> x.dylib does allow everyt

[Fink-devel] pgplot in 10.4 depends on g77 but works with g95

I'm doing a fresh install to test something and just found sci/ pgplot.info still has a g77 dependency. This can be changed to g95, and the patch script can become PatchScript: << #!/bin/zsh -ef mkdir sys_macosx cp %p/share/aquaterm/adapters/%N/g77_gcc_AQT.conf sys_macosx cp %p/share/aquaterm/

Re: [Fink-devel] dpkg 10.4 and Xcode2.3

On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:34:21PM -0700, William Scott wrote: > > I needed to make a fresh install of fink to test a package someone > complained to me about, and (re)discovered that -force_flat_namespace > prevents it from compiling, and then noted there was some concern > about its behavi

Re: [Fink-devel] .so vs .dylib

On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:25:50AM -0400, David Reiser wrote: > This isn't necessarily a fink question, but it might get to be... > > A change was made in gnucash 1.9.7 where the program looks to load > a .so module, but the compiler/linker only created .dylib files. The > object in question i

Re: [Fink-devel] .so vs .dylib

Thank you very much. That's what I needed to get started. The fog is slowly lifting. Someday I'll really understand... Dave On May 31, 2006, at 4:28 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: > On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:25:50AM -0400, David Reiser wrote: >> This isn't necessarily a fink question, but it might ge

Re: [Fink-devel] .so vs .dylib

Another useful fact, not mentioned on that page: these days, libtool and its autoconf friends can automatically name bundles as .so files if they are set up properly. Perhaps Peter O'Gorman can give some advice on this. -- Dave On May 31, 2006, at 3:05 PM, David Reiser wrote: > Thank

Re: [Fink-devel] .so vs .dylib

On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 09:25 -0400, David Reiser wrote: > This isn't necessarily a fink question, but it might get to be... > > A change was made in gnucash 1.9.7 where the program looks to load > a .so module, but the compiler/linker only created .dylib files. The > object in question is a Mac

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink Build Results

Le 30 mai 2006 à 22:53, Matthew Sachs a écrit : The latest build results, with Xcode 2.3, are up. It looks rather good; much of GNOME and KDE built on both architectures.

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink Build Results

On May 30, 2006, at 16:53, Matthew Sachs wrote: > One issue for the world build is that a lot of things are blocked > on ant. ant is a splitoff of ant-optional, which BuildDepends on > stylebook. stylebook is on my skip list because it hangs; I think > that one was the "uses AWT, but we do

Re: [Fink-devel] .so vs .dylib

On May 31, 2006, at 7:20 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 09:25 -0400, David Reiser wrote: >> This isn't necessarily a fink question, but it might get to be... >> >> A change was made in gnucash 1.9.7 where the program looks to load >> a .so module, but the compiler/linker only c

Re: [Fink-devel] .so vs .dylib

On May 31, 2006, at 7:20 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: [snip] > gnucash-1.9 probably still uses libltdl to open modules, doesn't it? > > Peter The module of immediate interest is loaded by gmodule. -- David Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Fink-devel mailin

Re: [Fink-devel] .so vs .dylib

On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 23:50 -0400, David Reiser wrote: > On May 31, 2006, at 7:20 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > > [snip] > > gnucash-1.9 probably still uses libltdl to open modules, doesn't it? > > > > Peter > > The module of immediate interest is loaded by gmodule. Ensure that the Makefile.am for

Re: [Fink-devel] .so vs .dylib

On Jun 1, 2006, at 12:32 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 23:50 -0400, David Reiser wrote: >> On May 31, 2006, at 7:20 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: >> >> [snip] >>> gnucash-1.9 probably still uses libltdl to open modules, doesn't it? >>> >>> Peter >> >> The module of immediate inter