10.5.2 Intel, pango-cairo branch.
./configure --prefix=/sw --mandir=/sw/share/man --libexecdir=/sw/lib/
nautilus-cd-burner --disable-dependency-tracking --disable-schemas-
install --disable-hal --disable-gnome-mount --enable-more-warnings --
enable-static PKG_CONFIG_PATH="/sw/lib/pango-ft219/li
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:17:37AM +0100, S?bastien Maret wrote:
> 10.5.2 Intel, pango-cairo branch.
>
> ./configure --prefix=/sw --mandir=/sw/share/man --libexecdir=/sw/lib/
> nautilus-cd-burner --disable-dependency-tracking --disable-schemas-
> install --disable-hal --disable-gnome-mount --ena
Daniel Macks wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:04:50AM -0700, Trevor Harmon wrote:
>
>> On Mar 16, 2008, at 7:11 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
>>
>>
>>> OSX 10.5.2 update, perhaps?
>>>
>> No, that was released on February 11. The package was working fine
>> with it. I'm pretty sure
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 09:06:50AM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> Daniel Macks wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:04:50AM -0700, Trevor Harmon wrote:
> >
> >> On Mar 16, 2008, at 7:11 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> OSX 10.5.2 update, perhaps?
> >>>
> >> No, that was
Daniel Macks wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 09:06:50AM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
>> Daniel Macks wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:04:50AM -0700, Trevor Harmon wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Mar 16, 2008, at 7:11 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
On Mar 18, 2008, at 8:22 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
> FWIW, I didn't test this submission...was a minor-version update to an
> existing package with minimal interaction with other packages, assumed
> that if it worked for submitter when submitted, it was good to go.
I'm sorry about this. I certainly
