Am 14.04.2011 um 14:33 schrieb Martin Costabel:
> Max Horn wrote:
> []
>> Though I still agree that sometimes it's a bit tough to avoid the
>> package name... OK, I can't think of a concrete example right now, but
>> imagine you had a tool called "image" for "image processing"... using
>> the des
Am 18.04.2011 um 14:49 schrieb Max Horn:
>
[...]
>
> OK... anybody opposed? To summarize, this are the changes I propose, each
> should be trivial to implement:
>
> 1) Drop the _warning_ when a package description exceeds 45 chars, only keep
> in the 60 chars _error_
> 2) Allow package name
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:50:40 0200, Max Horn wrote:
> Am 18.04.2011 um 14:49 schrieb Max Horn:
> >
> > OK... anybody opposed? To summarize, this are the changes I
propose, each should be trivial to implement:
> >
> > 1) Drop the _warning_ when a package description exceeds 45
chars, only
