At 19:33 Uhr -0500 16.03.2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
>Jeremy Higgs wrote:
>
>> Just out of interest, Max, what's the easiest way to use the split-off
>> packages when using 'fink selfupdate-cvs'? As far as I know, the split-offs
>> module is not checked out when using this, so should someone
OK, I just checked in yet another attempt to fix this darn issue. I
hope that it is correct this time. I actually used pen & paper and
played through various scenarios to try to fully grok this.
One issue is back that had been fixed with the previous checkin: if
you have a package foo with a s
Jeremy Higgs wrote:
> Just out of interest, Max, what's the easiest way to use the split-off
> packages when using 'fink selfupdate-cvs'? As far as I know, the split-offs
> module is not checked out when using this, so should someone wishing to try
> out the split-off packages check the module ou
Just out of interest, Max, what's the easiest way to use the split-off
packages when using 'fink selfupdate-cvs'? As far as I know, the split-offs
module is not checked out when using this, so should someone wishing to try
out the split-off packages check the module out manually and 'inject' it
I was updating audiofile (which I previously had installed in an
older, non-splitoff, but shlibs enabled version. That's what happend:
% fink update libjpeg
...
ln -sf
/sw/fink/dists/local/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libjpeg-bin_6b-5_darwin-powerpc.deb
/sw/fink/debs/
rm -rf /sw/src/root-libjpeg
I've just committed another small change to fink in CVS: "fink validate"
will now recognize the SplitOff fields, and when users are prompted to
make a choice among packages to satisfy a dependency, they are now
presented with the Description of the package as well as its name.
If you are testing
OK, I just put the (hopefully) last part of the splitoff change into
CVS: build dependencies of splitoffs and their parents are now always
properly computed (previously, this was not at all correct, one just
didn't notice it in many cases). In addition, I removed the annoying
debug message "Sp
Jeremy Higgs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Just to clarify things... A couple of minutes ago, I updated the download
> URL for qcad (in unstable), due to a report from a user that the previous
> URL no longer worked. I assume this is OK, as no recompilation of the
> package is neces
At 11:43 Uhr +0100 16.03.2002, Max Horn wrote:
>At 16:18 Uhr -0500 15.03.2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
>>Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Another thing that occurred to me while packaging is, is there a way to
>>> do multilines inside a splitoff? While making the kdelibs package, I
At 16:18 Uhr -0500 15.03.2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
>Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Another thing that occurred to me while packaging is, is there a way to
>> do multilines inside a splitoff? While making the kdelibs package, I have
>> a huge line of files in the "Files:"
At 17:04 Uhr +1100 16.03.2002, Jeremy Higgs wrote:
>On 15/3/02 10:52 PM, "David R. Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to remind all core fink developers of the most important rule when
>> committing things to CVS:
>>
>> IF YOU HAVE MADE ANY CHANGE TO YOUR PACKAGE, YOU MUST INCRE
At 14:05 Uhr + 15.03.2002, Gregory Block wrote:
>We're nearing release, and I'd like someone to help me with getting a
>package ready for mutella.
>
>I'm responsible for the port of Mutella to MacOS X, and will be taking over
>as package maintainer for some time while Max, who's done much of t
12 matches
Mail list logo
