This is the only email I could find, I just wanted to thank everyone
involved in the fink project. Thank You.
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Hi,
In the package request tracker there's an item for perl 5.6.1,
which would be very valuable for a lot of people. So would perl
5.7.2, and the upcoming perl 5.8.0. The only problem is what to
do with the Apple-installed version at /usr/bin/perl . There
are a few choices, and this
Ken == Ken Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ken I think this would work well. It's quite possible to have several
Ken versions of perl installed at once, with different library trees
Ken (site_perl). The choice of which one to execute would just depend on
Ken the PATH. (Just, he says
Yo,
I am going to fix source URLs in stable CVS, despite the freeze. I
think this is OK, since it will not affect any building etc., but is
vital for a 0.4.0 release. I hope nobody is troubled by this.
Cheers,
Max
--
---
Max Horn
Software
At 22:45 Uhr -0400 14.04.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote:
On Sunday, April 14, 2002, at 07:17 PM, Max Horn wrote:
Not really. I understand what you explain above. But it doesn't
justify packaging the .app in the first place, it only describes an
ugly (no offense meant) way to hack around a problem
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Kilian Koepsell wrote:
another related question: i have a package system-zope installed, which
depends on python-2.1.2 and i want to rebuild python. when i execute
fink rebuild python
it rebuilds the newer version 2.2 which i can't install, anyway. how
can i rebuild
There is a bug in smpeg that prevents it from building while libmpeg
is installed. I'll try to find a workaround for this, and would like
to submit the fixed packaged into stable, too - nothing will change,
only that it ignores /sw/include/mpeg.h
Objections?
Cheers,
Max
--
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Kilian Koepsell wrote:
i was going to package zope-2.5.0 (http://www.zope.com) and have some
questions:
- it depends on python-2.1.2, which is older than the most stable
version of python. shall i also make a system-zope package to enable
people to install a third
At 9:34 Uhr -0400 15.04.2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
Max Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 17:58 Uhr -0400 14.04.2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
I'd like to broaden the discussion a bit, by introducing another class of
.app's which I think we might have in the future: Foo.app which
On lundi, avril 15, 2002, at 02:48 , Masanori Sekino wrote:
On Sun, 14 Apr 2002 15:02:08 +0200
Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the exec is wrong, it should not be there. Without the exec, it
works as expected.
Fixed in 0.9.9-4.
Is this also an issue for the version in stable? I
hi,
i asked this already, but it was hidden in a longer message...
is there a certain procedure for assignin uids for fink-specific
users? or can i just pick an unused uid in the range 250-299 and add
it to the passwd package?
speciffically, i would like to have the user 'zope' for a package i
why am i getting lib errors when it's not linking??
snip terminal.app
Missing C++ runtime support for CC (/usr/bin/CC).
Compilation of the following test program failed:
--
#include iostream.h
int main(){ cout Hello World! endl; return
shlibs prolly depends on %N (= %v-%r) I'd remove rrdtool. rrdtool-shlibs
then try to instal version specific.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[g4:main/finkinfo/libs] ranger% fink --version
Package manager version: 0.9.10
Distribution version: 0.3.2a.cvs
[g4:main/finkinfo/libs] ranger% fink install
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 13:13, Justin Hallett wrote:
shlibs prolly depends on %N (= %v-%r) I'd remove rrdtool. rrdtool-shlibs
then try to instal version specific.
I have no current version of rrdtool installed, and had none installed
when I got that output...
--
Ben Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick
hi,
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 06:50:32PM +0100, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
Anyway, I was also thinking about revamping how to deal with extra users
in Fink... Users shouldn't have to agree to have all the users required
by any Fink package when they only want to use one of them, and it
shouldn't
On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 05:43 PM, Justin Hallett wrote:
snip terminal.app
Missing C++ runtime support for CC (/usr/bin/CC).
HFS+ is case insensitive, so /usr/bin/CC is actually cc, whereas on some
systems I think it's the C++ compiler frontend type thing. Perhaps you
should modify
good point thanks i just reinstalled libxpg4 not used to having it
installed yet...thanks, I'll try that.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Isn't this the true error message? This one is the well-known
DYLD_FORCE_FLAT_NAMESPACE/libxpg4 bug.
¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·.,
Justin F. Hallett
At 16:05 Uhr -0400 15.04.2002, Benjamin Reed wrote:
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 15:57, Max Horn wrote:
What happens if you do:
fink install rrdtool-1.0.33-6
?
Same thing... starts building 1.0.35.
Weird, maybe indeed a bug introduced by my splitoff changes. Can you
reproduce this with
At 20:15 Uhr +0200 15.04.2002, Kilian Koepsell wrote:
hi,
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 06:50:32PM +0100, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
Anyway, I was also thinking about revamping how to deal with extra users
in Fink... Users shouldn't have to agree to have all the users required
by any Fink package when
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 15:57, Max Horn wrote:
What happens if you do:
fink install rrdtool-1.0.33-6
?
Same thing... starts building 1.0.35.
:(
--
Ben Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://defiance.dyndns.org/ / http://radio.scenespot.org/
...if humanoids eat chicken, then
Benjamin Reed wrote:
[]
pkg rrdtool version 1.0.33-6
The following package will be installed or updated:
rrdtool
The following additional package will be installed:
rrdtool-shlibs
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
rm -rf rrdtool-1.0.35-2
mkdir -p /sw/src/rrdtool-1.0.35-2
tar -xvzf
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Kilian Koepsell wrote:
i just tried to install apache-1.3.23 and it seems they moved the
source-file. wget downloads apache-1.3.24.tar.gz but fink doesn't
recognise it and stops.
It's not under Fink [yet?], but you might want to give Apache 2.0 a try. I
downloaded built
On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 09:51 PM, Max Horn wrote:
someone would have to keep track of the uids in use, of course.
Yup. I thought about this, too. I'd suggest something to way Daemonic
stuff is handled.
But how do we keep track of user ids?
-- Finlay
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:42:17PM +0100, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
someone would have to keep track of the uids in use, of course.
Yup. I thought about this, too. I'd suggest something to way Daemonic
stuff is handled.
But how do we keep track of user ids?
if we would add a field like
At 17:58 Uhr -0400 15.04.2002, Chris Devers wrote:
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Martin Costabel wrote:
Removing one word 'exec' from the wrapper script makes it work.
Please tell me that a simple shell script change like this won't require
spending hours and hours recompiling Mozilla. Please tell me
At 10:32 PM -0400 4/15/02, Kyle Moffett wrote:
I have a proposal to make:
Fink packages in unstable-cvs and stable-cvs requiring a package
manager newer than the latest bindist should include a FinkVersion
tag that would be checked at package read time. If the number is
greater than the
26 matches
Mail list logo
