Re: [Fink-devel] New developer looks for current branch....

2002-10-02 Thread Xavier HUMBERT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alexander Hansen) wrote : Is net-snmp even available for Jaguar yet? I don't know. It's in the main branch of the CVS tree on the CVS Web. And I thought 0.4.1 wasn't for Jaguar? Ooops, that was a type. Indeed it's 0.40: | [xavier@doriath dists]$ fink --version | Package

[Fink-devel] Needs to re-ranlib, why ?

2002-10-02 Thread Xavier HUMBERT
While packaging a Linux prog, I ran into a strange issue (and didn't keep the log, stupid me) The software needs to be linked against liblwres (from bind9), but configure couldn't find it. Looking at config.log, I saw that cannot find symbols in liblwres, run rannlib or something similar. I ran

[Fink-devel] sane-backend

2002-10-02 Thread John Doe
Hi my name is Raphael!! I am using fink and it is great!! Thank you developer!! But I have a question: Is it possible to port the scanner access software sane to the darwin shell? I´m not a developer And i hope somebody of you have an idea!! Thank you for hearing me Raphael

[Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-beginners] 0.4.1, again ...

2002-10-02 Thread David R. Morrison
Yes, 0.5.0pre.cvs sounds good to me... --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-beginners] can anyone upgrade to 0.4.1?

2002-10-02 Thread Martin Costabel
Joe Heafner wrote: Hi. I'm just wondering if anyone has actually been able to upgrade to Fink 0.4.1? It is possible that the answer is no. The upgrade from 0.4.0 or 0.4.0a to 0.4.1 via fink selfupdate has not been tested until very recently. I am forwarding this to the fink-devel list.

[Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-beginners] 0.4.1, again ...

2002-10-02 Thread Ben Hines
On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 04:00 PM, Michael Feeney wrote: Is it even possible to upgrade to fink 0.4.1 in 10.2.1? Or am I (also) proceeding incorrectly? You are fine, you have the latest for 10.2 devs: this confusion is because dists/VERSION still reads 0.4.0.cvs. Perhaps we