On Sunday, December 1, 2002, at 12:05 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
1) is anyone already planning this?
Not that I'm aware of...
It would be nice to abstract the package management side of things away
from the fink tool, definitely. It would be very helpful if anybody,
say, wanted to write a
On Thursday, November 28, 2002, at 02:12 AM, Joe Block wrote:
Merchant accounts cost money every month. Lots of money, I'm told.
If the project is going to accept donations, we should probably look
at PayPal. They charge too, but at least it is on a per-transaction
basis and not
Title: oroborus-1.14.0-4
/usr/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/crt1.o illegal reference to symbol:
___keymgr_dwarf2_register_sections defined in indirectly referenced
dynamic library /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib
make: *** [oroborus] Error 1
### execution of make failed, exit code 2
Failed: compiling
On Sunday, December 1, 2002, at 11:23 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Ben Er, we already do have a fink cleanup command. :)
No we don't:
Common commmands:
[snip list without cleanup]
This is from fink --help.
If it's not there, it DOESN'T EXIST.
Hmm, look at the header for that
Peter == Peter O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter Hmm, look at the header for that list Common commands, it does not
Peter say every command, there is no need to shout at the entire list.
And where do you find any other documentation then?
man fink = no indication of clean either.
Are
On Sunday, December 1, 2002, at 09:12 AM, Jason Deraleau wrote:
Jaguar is using gcc 3.1, does anyone know if that version of gcc
supports
AltiVec specific optimizations? If so, are Fink packages built for
these
G4-only extensions? The reason why I'm asking is because I've been
playing
with
JD Jaguar is using gcc 3.1, does anyone know if that version of gcc
supports
JD AltiVec specific optimizations? If so, are Fink packages built for these
JD G4-only extensions? The reason why I'm asking is because I've been
playing
JD with Gentoo Linux (gentoo.org), which uses a system somewhat
On Sunday, December 1, 2002, at 11:14 AM, Jason Deraleau wrote:
Is it possible to have at least Fink use it? Perhaps something similar
with
an /sw/etc/make.conf file that contains the user's preferred gcc flags?
Even if optimizations get added, a make.conf will not happen, since
one of fink's
Hi Dave and fink developers!
Today I happened to read the following on the MacOSX-Tex mailing list.
What do you think about it?
Chris.
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Re: Full Screen PDF presentation?
From: Gerben Wierda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:05:50 +0100
On Wednesday, Nov 27,
Hi Dave and fink developers!
Today I happened to read the following on the MacOSX-Tex mailing list.
What do you think about it?
Chris.
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Re: Full Screen PDF presentation?
From: Gerben Wierda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:05:50 +0100
On Wednesday, Nov 27,
Gerben Wierda also contacted me privately about removing his name from
Fink's teTeX distribution, or at least clearly indicating that he no
longer supports the ancient version that Fink synced with. I have
modified the Fink package descriptions, and the README in Fink's tetex-macosx
package, in
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I. -I../lib -I../diff -I../zlib
-I/usr/include -isystem /sw/include -g -O2 -c `test -f client.c ||
echo './'`client.c
client.c: In function `update_entries':
client.c:1996: storage size of `context' isn't known
client.c:2042: storage size of `context' isn't
On Sunday, December 1, 2002, at 03:41 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote:
The subject line says it all:
fink selfupdate-cvs
[...CVS updating...]
fink list | grep '(i)' # -- This should be available as 'fink
listold' or something
It may be; check 'fink list --help'.
(note: that should be in the man
Perhaps we could sync with a newer version. :) I'd rather not have
everyone hate fink.
Wierda's strategy is to create a teTeX distribution with an easy-to-use
installer, but only distribute it in binary form. Figuring out how to
stay in sync with him is not easy, and it's something he wasn't
FYI, you can grab the old sources from http://snapshot.debian.net/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sunday, December 1, 2002, at 12:37 PM, Jan de Leeuw wrote:
But what about fftw and ATLAS, whose whole purpose in life is to be
different on different systems ?
What about them? There are exceptions to every rule. These were
mentioned last time this discussion was held.
-Ben
Your experimental dpkg-1.10.9 info file is working for me so far on
10.2.2, no build problems and dselect is working fine so far.
(I just had to download the tarball from http://debian.teleglobe.net, I
guess it's not on the sf servers yet.)
I would like to see paths within the man files for
17 matches
Mail list logo
