Hi,
I hope mailing this list is the correct place, but I've tried to email the maintainer of the gtk+2 package, but I get an automatic email back from his email provider saying that he is over his quota, so it won't receive the message!!!
I'm having problems compiling GTK+2.0.6-2. It was
Robert Isenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I hope mailing this list is the correct place, but I've tried to email
the maintainer of the gtk+2 package, but I get an automatic email back
from his email provider saying that he is over his quota, so it won't
receive the message!!!
I'm
Hi all, I just found out this morning that I'm the maintainer of
'libnids' Until now i didn't know I was. :) Now I need to know how
I can update and/or edit the package description. I know nothing and
there was no readily available info on the sourceforge page. I'm about
to go and try
I think this has been discussed before, but it has come up again a lot
lately:
Many (most) packages that need to run under X11 have a dependency on
the virtual package x11. This is not enough to make them work.
The x11 virtual package is provided by the xfree86-base package. The
problem with
Martin == Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin Either the Provides: x11 has to be shifted from *-base to
Martin *-rootless, or the packages that really need X11 windows and not just
Martin some of the libraries, must depend on something else, maybe another
Martin virtual package
Jeff Whitaker wrote:
Why force people to install xfree86-rootless if they
don't really need to?
Because is solves real, multi-hour problems. The cost is very
marginal: systems that need x-base and not x servers and their
price is only a few minutes of install time. The disk space is
only
David wrote:
please keep in mind, that this is a VERY important decision. As the
documentation maintainer I will have to make sure that every reference
to X11 is then changed to the new name and that consistency is provided
throughout the whole documentation.
What the documentation
Bruce Korb wrote:
Jeff Whitaker wrote:
Why force people to install xfree86-rootless if they
don't really need to?
Because is solves real, multi-hour problems. The cost is very
marginal: systems that need x-base and not x servers and their
price is only a few minutes of install time. The
David == David [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How about x11-server?
David Hello guys,
David please keep in mind, that this is a VERY important decision. As the
David documentation maintainer I will have to make sure that every reference
David to X11 is then changed to the new name
No,
Eric Nicholson wrote:
The package seems to need newer Gnome App libraries the install ends
like this
checking for Gnome App libraries (GAL) = 0.20.1.99... 0.19.2 found
configure: error:
You need Gnome App libraries (GAL) 0.20.1.99 or later to build gtkhtml.
### execution of ./configure failed,
On 6 Jan 2003, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
David == David [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Hello guys,
David please keep in mind, that this is a VERY important decision. As the
David documentation maintainer I will have to make sure that every reference
David to X11 is then changed to the new
At 9:25 PM +0100 1/6/03, Martin Costabel wrote:
Bruce Korb wrote:
Jeff Whitaker wrote:
Why force people to install xfree86-rootless if they
don't really need to?
Because is solves real, multi-hour problems. The cost is very
marginal: systems that need x-base and not x servers and their
On Monday, January 6, 2003, at 05:13 PM, Torrey Lyons wrote:
I haven't been lurking on fink-devel long enough to have insight into
what the earlier debates on this were, but I have always found it
strange that fink still separates the server from rest of XFree86.
Sure you can think of
On Monday, January 6, 2003, at 11:02 PM, Brian Kendig wrote:
'/usr/local' is the well-established place to put software that's not
part of the system distribution. The FAQ says this, too. But what
the FAQ doesn't acknowledge is that not every piece of local software
has to fit into
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Dienstag, Jänner 7, 2003, at 08:40 Uhr, Brian Kendig wrote:
snip
Installing from the Fink 0.5.0a disk image doesn't prompt me for a
location; it automatically uses '/sw'. I'll go back and reinstall
from the .tar.gz file. (But
15 matches
Mail list logo
