THANK YOU! Not knowing this just cost about 48 hours of my life in
trying to get another program I am trying to prepare for fink to
compile.
It seems that with Apple's libGL, you cannot use -force_flat_namespace
any more, because the libGL.dylib in /usr/X11R6/lib loads the one in
the
OpenGL fr
>From my experience, any commands in ~/.xinitrc affect the entire X session.
This is what my .xinitrc looks like:
source /sw/bin/init.sh
source ~/.bash_profile
xmodmap -e "keysym 59 = Delete"
autocutsel &
exec quartz-wm
What it does is run the Fink path-fix script, loads my local bash settings,
f
Hi,
I am a total newbie with X11.
Is there a way to permanently tell Apple's X11 to append Fink's /sw in
its PATH? I didn't see any info yet on the fink web site how to do this.
This is required for example to run xboard together with gnuchess. One
can launch xboard easily enough by adding "/s
I've had some experience with this, trying to get the oss tuxracer to
stop crashing under certain conditions.
Here are my 2 cents:
1. If one application wants to be prebound, all of its libraries and
dependencies must be compiled prebound. That means X11, qt3, and
everything elseif you're go
Hi John,
Personally I'd like to see DadaDodo in Fink. (You may remember me from
such silly Fink packages as funny-manpages and wtf. ;) ).
My take on this issue is people use Fink because they don't want to (or
don't know how to) compile/install/remove unix-ish software on their
own, so even
Hello.
I come to fink from a BSD-style "ports" background. There are lots of
simple packages in the BSD ports tree, packages which don't do anything
other than a vanilla fetch, make, and make install.
What's the fink take on these kinds of simple packages? Would it be
useful for me to packag
At 23:25 Uhr +0900 12.02.2003, Masanori Sekino wrote:
I removed popt, which declares "BuildDependsOnly: True", from
"Depends" line of oaf. At the sametime, I added popt to
"BuildDepends" line of following packages:
anjuta0.9.99-3
eroaster 2.0.12-2
evolution 1.2.2-2
galeon
On Feb 12,2003 14:47:14 -0500, Carsten Klapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote :
>Hi All,
>
>I received positive feedback for a few of my packages. Since I have CVS
>access, should I just commit them to the stable tree myself? (As
>opposed to non-developers who would submit a "please move my package t
Hi All,
I received positive feedback for a few of my packages. Since I have CVS
access, should I just commit them to the stable tree myself? (As
opposed to non-developers who would submit a "please move my package to
stable" request on the SF tracker.)
Then, should I explicitly notify someone
Here are two questions about GSL (Gnu Scientific Library) package:
1) I haven't been able to run "make check" successfully, even if I've
already installed Dec02 Dev update (still get "internal compiler
error")? Any hint about this issue?
2) Would I gain any performance improvement recompiling t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi developers,
(ps sorry for the previous message that was sent accidentally
subject-less)
I have been using a modified Gtk+2 build, set to depend on libpng3, to
run ROX Filer and everything works fine - should the dependencies on
gtk+2 and gtk-eng
Hi developers,
I have been using a modified Gtk+2 build, set to depend on libpng3, to
run ROX Filer and everything works fine - should the dependencies on
gtk+2 and gtk-engines be changed to reflect the upgrade to libpng3?
Regards,
- Michel
Public key:
http://salimma.freeshell.org/files/crypto
I removed popt, which declares "BuildDependsOnly: True", from "Depends"
line of oaf. At the sametime, I added popt to "BuildDepends" line of
following packages:
anjuta0.9.99-3
eroaster 2.0.12-2
evolution 1.2.2-2
galeon1.2.6-2
glunarclock 0.24.1-2
gnucash 1.8.0-2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Mittwoch, Februar 12, 2003, at 02:26 Uhr, David R. Morrison wrote:
Good idea? Bad idea?
Good Idea. I was going to do it myself later this day. It is important,
that we start alerting our userbase to the things which pertain Fink
not o
I was thinking it would be good to announce the new version of FinkCommander
in Fink's news section. (Note that 2/3 of our news items these days have
to do with other people's products: X11.app, Virex, etc., so this would
continue the trend of alerting Fink users to interesting developments.)
Goo
You are trying to use fink distribution 0.4.0 with OS X 10.2. You need to
upgrade your Fink to a 10.2-compatible version (0.5.0a or later).
-- Dave
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = So
Jari Perttunen wrote:
[]
pkg system-xfree86 version 4.2-1
Too old. Get version 4.2-5.
--
Martin
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
... crashes with:
**
Date/Time: 2003-01-21 11:28:01 +0100
OS Version: 10.2.3 (Build 6G30)
Host: stardust.micromata.priv
Command:emacs
PID:897
Exception: EXC_BREAKPOINT (0x0006)
Code[0]:0x0001Code[1]:0x8fe01280
Thread 0 Crashed:
#0 0x8fe01280 in halt
For the first thank you for doing excellent work with Fink.
I have this problem (and possibly a confusion) with system-xfree86.
I have installed Apple X11 (beta 2) and if I'm right I need to install
system-xfree86 to tell fink that X11 is installed. The installation
fails.
I can install 'xfree
19 matches
Mail list logo