Re: [Fink-devel] rsync vs. cvs

2003-10-02 Thread Peter O'Gorman
David R. Morrison wrote: The simplest thing to do is to simply add this as an alternative method. But we were just discussing on #fink a more drastic change: we could scrap anonymous cvs access altogether, and offer only two access methods, rsync or ext cvs (the latter for fink developers only).

[Fink-devel] Circular dependencies with xfree86?

2003-10-02 Thread Pascal Bourguignon
Ok, I used yes '' | fink install ..., and now it installed system-xfree86 instead of xfree86-base and xfree86-rootless I wanted... So I'm trying to install xfree86-base to overwrite system-xfree86. I cannot remove system-xfree86 because there is a lot of package depending on it: su-2.05a#

Re: [Fink-devel] Circular dependencies with xfree86?

2003-10-02 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On Thursday, October 2, 2003, at 11:21 AM, Pascal Bourguignon wrote: snip So, xfree86-base cannot replace system-xfree86 because it lacks libgl, but xfree86-rootless would provide libgl. Here we go: su-2.05a# fink install xfree86-base xfree86-rootless Information about 1314 packages read in

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc3.3 tree open for business

2003-10-02 Thread Christian Schaffner
Hi Dave On Mittwoch, Oktober 1, 2003, at 07:19 Uhr, David R. Morrison wrote: All fink developers are now invited to help out with the 10.2-gcc3.3 trees. Here's how: In fink 0.13.8 which was released yesterday, GCC 3.1 is being enforced for the first time. To use the revised developer tools

Re: [Fink-devel] fort77 can't be compiled.

2003-10-02 Thread Pascal J . Bourguignon
Jeff Whitaker writes: On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Pascal J.Bourguignon wrote: Pascal: If you installed the gcc3.3 update, sudo /usr/sbin/gcc_select 3.1 and rebuild f2c and fort77. If you haven't installed gcc 3.3, I have no idea what's wrong. Ok, so some fink packages need 3.3, other

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink vs. Panther (apt failure)

2003-10-02 Thread Chris Pepper
At 9:55 AM -0400 2003/09/30, Benjamin Reed wrote: Chris Pepper wrote: I'm running 7b68 on a dual G4, and bootstrap.sh fails to build apt; is a fix or workaround available? I assume you mean the 0.5.3 bootstrap from the tarball? That definitely won't work... I checked the archives, but

[Fink-devel] gcc_select 3

2003-10-02 Thread Yarden Livnat
Greatings, I have upgraded to fink 13.9 from the cvs and run ./inject.pl I'm running on Panther which means I'm using gcc3.3 by default I had very few problems compiling programs via fink, that is until today. Now that the gcc_select is up it forces me to switch to gcc_select 3 before

Re: [Fink-devel] fort77 can't be compiled.

2003-10-02 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On Tuesday, September 30, 2003, at 11:37 AM, Pascal J.Bourguignon wrote: Jeff Whitaker writes: On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Pascal J.Bourguignon wrote: Pascal: If you installed the gcc3.3 update, sudo /usr/sbin/gcc_select 3.1 and rebuild f2c and fort77. If you haven't installed gcc 3.3, I have no

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc_select 3

2003-10-02 Thread David R. Morrison
We're still in the process of upgrading packages to be ready for gcc 3.3. The enforcement of the fink declaration GCC: 3.1 was not done in the past, but is now being done with the recent upgrade. Your best strategy if you are using panther is to make sure that the dists symlink points to

Re: [Fink-devel] fort77 can't be compiled.

2003-10-02 Thread David R. Morrison
clisp-2.29 is also available from fink in binary form. The binary was compiled with gcc 3.1. -- Dave --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf