TheSin wrote:
is the fink-mirrors package going to ask me the same questions
everytime? is so could it get it's own config file or read fink.s it's
very annoying.
The strange thing is it doesn't behave the same everywhere. I have been
doing this update on 3 machines, and on two of them it only
Chris Pepper wrote:
[]
Alas, it's not completely fixed. I have the current fink package,
but it still fails on fink-mirrors.
I tried downloading the fink-mirrors tarball directly and dropping
it into /sw/src, but that doesn't help either.
OK, so you have fink-0.17.3-1 installed, and I
Another way to fix this now is to download the fink-0.17.4-1 tarball,
unpack it and run ./inject.pl in it, and then run fink selfupdate.
-- Dave
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just
Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TheSin wrote:
is the fink-mirrors package going to ask me the same questions
everytime? is so could it get it's own config file or read fink.s it's
very annoying.
The strange thing is it doesn't behave the same everywhere. I have been
doing
http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/ethereal lists there being
a 0.9.16-11 ethereal but only 0.9.14-1 ethereal-ssl. Any reason for
that?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just
I've determined that the very last version of the fink package manager which
bootstraps successfully on 10.1 is fink-0.12.1.
Here's what I propose to do:
1) add fink-0.12.1-1.info to 10.1/unstable/main/finkinfo/base
2) make the fink 0.12.1 release visible on sourceforge, and label it
for OS X
