I think fink validate should do this test. I am aware of the fact
that fink validate is (at this moment) a very bare test. But to me it
seems the most logical place to validate that the package can be used
in "stable".
Carl.
---
This SF.N
A few days ago I submitted compiler/assembler/debugger/newlib for
6811/6812 (Motorola/Freescale micro controller).
I also have a m68hc1x-gel.info (gnu embedded library) file, but I did
not yet submit it. It does not compile the library, nor the
testsuite. Its quality is not yet at fink level
(I have sent this before, but the message was too big. I stripped some text)Help! Fink removed gnucash (and some other packages) and cannot reinstall it. Then I tried selfupdate which gives these errors:rsync -az -q rsync://bru.be.eu.finkmirrors.net/finkinfo//TIMESTAMP /sw/fink/TIMESTAMP.tmpI will
Cannot compile package:
The package 'gnucash' will be built and installed.
Reading dependency for gnucash-2.0.2-4...
WARNING: While resolving dependency "goffice-shlibs" for package
"gnucash-2.0.2-4", package "goffice-shlibs" was not found.
Reading build dependency for gnucash-2.0.2-4...
WARNIN
