Re: [Fink-devel] glib 2.0

2002-03-13 Thread Dan Winship
On Wednesday, March 13, 2002, at 07:53 AM, Max Horn wrote: > Would be nice if we had a package for glib 2.0 - ideally, it would be > able to coexist to the current glib, though I am not sure how hard it > would be exactly. All of the GNOME libraries are supposed to be set up so that you can

Re: [Fink-devel] glib 2.0

2002-03-13 Thread Dan Winship
> That's not completly true. Some files are installed by both, like > glib-config, etc.. No, glib 2.0 uses pkgconfig. If there are any files that both try to install, it's a bug and should be reported to bugzilla.gnome.org. You're supposed to be able to have both glib 1.2.10 and glib 2.0 inst

Re: [Fink-devel] dirent.h

2002-03-31 Thread Dan Winship
>> Usually a missing >> >> #include > > Martin is right, just to clarify this: it's a bug in OS X's version of > dirent.h, rather in the software with that problem. We have to fix it > in a quite a lot of pacakges. Couldn't we create /sw/include/dirent.h that just did #include #include ?