Re: [Fink-devel] submitted packages

2003-07-27 Thread Matt Stephenson
Hi James, I will find sometime this week to look at them. Cheers Matt On Sunday, Jul 27, 2003, at 05:36 Australia/Canberra, James Gibbs wrote: Hi, anyone care to check my three Advance packages, AdvanceMame, AdvanceMenu, and AdvanceScan. They have been in the tracker since June 14. They

Re: [Fink-devel] openldap-ssl-shlibs-2.1.22-1 incompatible with cyrus-sasl2-shlibs-2.1.15-1 ?

2003-07-24 Thread Matt Stephenson
Hi Chris I'm having no problems building openldap-ssl against cyrus-sasl2-2.1.15 checking for sasl/sasl.h... yes checking for sasl.h... no checking for sasl_client_init in -lsasl2... yes checking Cyrus SASL library version... yes Send me your config.log Cheers Matt On Wednesday, Jul 23, 2003,

Re: [Fink-devel] python modules do not comply with policy

2003-04-03 Thread Matt Stephenson
On Friday, Apr 4, 2003, at 00:08 Australia/Sydney, Peter O'Gorman wrote: On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 10:57 PM, Jeff Whitaker wrote: So, I'll create numeric-py22 and pil-py22 packages ASAP and put them in experimental/jswhit. If you were here, I'd kiss you :-) Thanks, if you do not wish to

Re: [Fink-devel] python modules do not comply with policy

2003-04-02 Thread Matt Stephenson
On Wednesday, Apr 2, 2003, at 23:57 Australia/Sydney, Peter O'Gorman wrote: Hi, Depending upon which version of python is installed, the modules will go into a different place (/sw/lib/python-VERSION/site-packages). Now, this is a problem for me, and I think I will have to make numeric-py22

Re: glut license (was Re: [Fink-devel] MD5)

2003-03-31 Thread Matt Stephenson
On Tuesday, Apr 1, 2003, at 11:17 Australia/Sydney, Ben Hines wrote: On Monday, March 31, 2003, at 02:16 AM, Matt Stephenson wrote: I tend towards 'Restrictive/Distributable' because nothing is mentioned specifically in the glut license about distributing binaries, its just a general

Re: glut license (was Re: [Fink-devel] MD5)

2003-03-30 Thread Matt Stephenson
Hi Dave, Must of had a esp moment as I had just drafted an email to you regarding the glut license field, I will add a 'Restrictive/Distributable' licence field to it sometime today as I also have to add a missing 'BuildDependsOnly: True' field to it as well. Matt On Monday, Mar 31, 2003, at

Re: [Fink-devel] Configure error?

2003-02-20 Thread Matt Stephenson
The developer tools are supplied by apple and contain such things as a compiler which is what you need to build fink packages. Go here, http://www.apple.com/developer and sign up for the free web based membership, then you can log in and download the developer tools. Matt On Friday, Feb 21,

Re: [Fink-devel] two questions

2002-12-17 Thread Matt Stephenson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. What am I supposed to do as a package maintainer? Specifically, if I need to correct or update an .info file, who do I contact, or where do I submit the corrections? (Sorry if I missed something on the web site.) Just submit any updates or changes to the

Re: [Fink-devel] can we upgrade blt to stable?

2002-12-13 Thread Matt Stephenson
Done :) Thanks Matt William Scott wrote: Hi Matt: I've been making use of blt regularly for the last few months without problems and I believe it is fine. I had to recompile it after upgrading to tcltk version 8.4 (in unstable) but other than that it hasn't caused any problems for me at

Re: [Fink-devel] bundle-gnome-1.4-3

2002-11-27 Thread Matt Stephenson
Run a fink selfupdate-cvs and try again, fixed this yesterday. Matt David Fritschi wrote: -- Package manager version: 0.10.0 Distribution version: Mac OS X version: 10.2.2 July 2002 Developer Tools gcc version: 3.1 make version: 3.79 Feedback Courtesy of FinkCommander How do you want to

Re: [Fink-devel] bundle-gnome-1.4-3

2002-11-27 Thread Matt Stephenson
Also you are running fink 0.10.0 on 10.2, you should be running 0.11.0, have you done the upgrade for 10.2 here http://fink.sourceforge.net/news/jaguar.php Matt Package manager version: 0.10.0 Distribution version: Mac OS X version: 10.2.2 July 2002 Developer Tools gcc version: 3.1 make

Re: [Fink-devel] future of Fink

2002-11-26 Thread Matt Stephenson
This would be a lot easier if OmniWeb stopped calling everything it downloaded from the trackers "download.php". Can this be fixed? I am incredibly annoyed by that as well. It is a bug in their server, i believe, but they don't seem to care:

Re: [Fink-devel] 0.5.0 timetable

2002-11-05 Thread Matt Stephenson
Benjamin Reed wrote: On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 13:35, Alexander Strange wrote: I think we still need to deal with our 'cups' package. We should just use Apple's libraries and binaries, but provide the headers ourselves. (I think there is a package in experimental/rangerrick/). If no one has

Re: [Fink-devel] what are the criteria for adding software to the fink distribution?

2002-11-02 Thread Matt Stephenson
Look here for a better idea http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/packaging/policy.php#licenses Matt On Sunday, Nov 3, 2002, at 16:01 Australia/Sydney, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Folks: Is fink limited only to GPL-type open-source software, or is there an interest in other software with a more

Re: [Fink-devel] planned announce mail for 0.4.1 - please comment

2002-09-24 Thread Matt Stephenson
On Wednesday, Sep 25, 2002, at 09:25 Australia/Sydney, Max Horn wrote: With Fink 0.4.1, Mac OS X 10.1 is still the operating system of choice. In fact this will be the last full release of Fink to still support System 10.2. Typo :) Shouldn't this be 10.1 Matt

Re: [Fink-devel] A strange question...

2002-06-13 Thread Matt Stephenson
There is a package in fink called daemonic, which creates a startup item for you. See http://daemonic.sourceforge.net Also do "fink info daemonic" and "fink info mysql" Matt On Sunday, July 14, 2002, at 03:29 AM, Jason Deraleau wrote: I've installed Fink and several different packages,

Re: [Fink-devel] QT2 package

2002-05-11 Thread Matt Stephenson
On Saturday, May 11, 2002, at 10:15 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote: dependency on qt-2.3.1-1 (I have tried ( 3.0.0-1), but that doesn't install the qt-2.3.1-1 package.)... Have you tried (= 2.3.1-1) HTH Matt ___ Have big pipes?

Re: [Fink-devel] readline ready for stable?

2002-03-17 Thread Matt Stephenson
Do agree, and is working fine for me. Matt On Monday, March 18, 2002, at 12:39 AM, Max Horn wrote: For me, the new readline-shlibs has worked quite fine for some time now. Can others confirm this? If yes, it should be moved ASAP to stable since other packages are pending simple because

Re: [Fink-devel] Planning this mail - comment please

2002-03-17 Thread Matt Stephenson
Excellent idea, I'd include aalib and libmpeg as the gimp needs these and samba as well. Matt On Monday, March 18, 2002, at 05:19 AM, Max Horn wrote: I plan to send out the following mail to fink-beginners, fink-user, and fink-announce. Please tell me what you think of it, if should forget

Re: [Fink-devel] feedback on unstable packages

2002-03-17 Thread Matt Stephenson
Thanks for the feedback, to get the email address for the maintainer of a particular package just type 'fink info packagename' :) Matt On Monday, March 18, 2002, at 01:23 PM, Aaron Seitz wrote: (By the way it is hard to send messages about individual packages directly to the package