Max Horn wrote:
At 22:22 Uhr +0100 20.04.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
[]
Also, gcc is gcc3, and I think configure scripts search that
first. Not to mention, we'll probably want to move to the gcc3 tool
chain ASAP anyway. :-)
Do we? Why?
[]
Don't think so.
I don't think so either. The c++
At 10:10 Uhr +0200 22.04.2002, Martin Costabel wrote:
Max Horn wrote:
At 22:22 Uhr +0100 20.04.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
[]
Also, gcc is gcc3, and I think configure scripts search that
first. Not to mention, we'll probably want to move to the gcc3 tool
chain ASAP anyway. :-)
Do we?
Martin and Max wrote:
BTW, what sense does it make to split apt into several pieces? No other
package depends on it.
I don't see a reason for that, either... nor do I see one for
splitting libtool, but that's another story :-)
Well, it's all in preparation for the automated handling of
The April 2002 Developer Tools is out (although it's classed as a
public beta release). Currently it's available only if you have an ADC
Seed Key, but it should become available to everybody else over the
coming week or so.
Anyway, it includes a toolchain based on gcc3.1, so I expect some
At 10:05 AM +0100 4/20/02, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
The April 2002 Developer Tools is out (although it's classed as a
public beta release). Currently it's available only if you have an
ADC Seed Key, but it should become available to everybody else over
the coming week or so.
Anyway, it includes a
At 14:06 Uhr -0700 20.04.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
At 10:05 AM +0100 4/20/02, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
The April 2002 Developer Tools is out (although it's classed as a
public beta release). Currently it's available only if you have
an ADC Seed Key, but it should become available to everybody else
At 22:22 Uhr +0100 20.04.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
On Saturday, April 20, 2002, at 10:06 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
According to the release notes, the default compiler is still
2.95.2. In PB you have to set USEGCC3 variable to use gcc3.
More apropos to fink, I have the new tools installed, and cc
At 11:14 PM +0200 4/20/02, Max Horn wrote:
Might be. Hm, I haven't downloaded the tools yet, but didn't they
want to ship a tool which allows you to switch between the compiler
versions or something?
Yep, yer right.. just read those notes.. (there are a lot of them)
At 12:54 PM -0700
At 11:14 PM +0200 4/20/02, Max Horn wrote:
Note that this says *nothing* at all. Alls OS X compilers so far
called themselves 2.95.2, yet there are substantial differences
between the versions. If you really want to know what version it is,
use cc -v
Nothing? Seems to say enough to tell a
I wish :-) or I wish that we cold at least share the wealth with each
other...
anyone have an extra seed key they don't use? :-)
On Saturday, April 20, 2002, at 06:00 PM, Alexander Strange wrote:
On Saturday, April 20, 2002, at 05:22 PM, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
Also, gcc is gcc3, and I
10 matches
Mail list logo
