I mean, would we have 'apt-get install xchat-ssl-nognome' or what?
On Saturday, January 19, 2002, at 04:59 AM, Max Horn wrote:
At 9:42 Uhr + 19.01.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
On Saturday, January 19, 2002, at 04:27 am, Alexander Strange wrote:
What do we do about apt-get?
Nothing?
At 15:06 Uhr -0500 18.01.2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
On the question of variants, there is one thing that is very important
to keep in mind: fink is a front-end to dpkg.
This means that whatever scheme we adopt, there will need to be a translation
to dpkg names.
If we are feeding dependency
On Friday, January 18, 2002, at 06:04 , Max Horn wrote:
At 17:08 Uhr -0500 18.01.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote:
I was originally looking at something like this and I have thought a lot about it, one of the main reasons to use xml for a new format was the necessary complexity.
On Friday, January 18,
On 19/1/02 6:48 AM, Max Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Package: foo
Version: 1.0
Revision: 1
ConfigureParams: --with-gargle-blaster
Depends: bar
DefaultOption: x11
Option: ssl
Depends: openssl
NotOption: ssl
ConfigureParams: --without-ssl
Option: x11
Depends: x11
