On Sunday, Jul 20, 2003, at 13:42 US/Eastern, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Well-written Perl is just as readable as any other language.
Problem is (1) most people don't bother learning Perl as well
as they learn other languages (since it's so easy to do things
with a minimal understanding) and (2)
I just got back from my trip, I will work on my code over the next week
(Yay, vacation!) and hopefully have some prototype material by then.
On Sunday, Jul 20, 2003, at 03:58 US/Eastern, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Why objective-C? Perl would get the job done faster, cheaper, and
with a larger
Am Sonntag, 20.07.03 um 07:41 Uhr schrieb Kyle Moffett:
I would like to propose a new internal engine for fink, based around
an Objective C library that I will call Finch in this email. I will
be unavailable for the next 3 weeks, but will work on code in my spare
time. When I get back, I
Why objective-C? Perl would get the job done faster, cheaper, and
with a larger installed base of people who can make contributions.
With Perl, it is more difficult to add bindings that make it usable in
C/Obj-C/etc. On the other hand, with C function callbacks to the
Objective C objects, it
On Sunday, Jul 20, 2003, at 05:27 US/Eastern, Max Horn wrote:
Just one word conflict handling. The single most biggest problem.
Plain forward dependencies are trtivial to handle and are already
handled in the existing engine. The hard cases are conflicts, and the
many many border cases, e.g.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Kyle I would like to propose a new internal engine for fink, based around
Kyle an Objective C library that I will call Finch in this email.
Why objective-C? Perl would get the job done faster, cheaper, and
with a larger
Am Sonntag, 20.07.03 um 16:02 Uhr schrieb Benjamin Reed:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Kyle I would like to propose a new internal engine for fink, based
around
Kyle an Objective C library that I will call Finch in this email.
Why objective-C? Perl
Max == Max Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Max I don't think any of our performance problems are due to perl anyway,
Max and so far nobody (including Kyle) has been able to prove
Max otherwise. All bottlenecks I see so far are disk I/O related, or due
Max to suboptimal algorithms (i.e. our abuse
Hisashi == Hisashi T Fujinaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hisashi On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
If there's any part of the Perl programming that is too slow, please
demonstrate it with benchmarks.
Hisashi Reading the code. I can reread most of my code with some work; perl
Am Sonntag, 20.07.03 um 17:23 Uhr schrieb Randal L. Schwartz:
Max == Max Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Max I don't think any of our performance problems are due to perl
anyway,
Max and so far nobody (including Kyle) has been able to prove
Max otherwise. All bottlenecks I see so far are disk I/O
I would like to propose a new internal engine for fink, based around an
Objective C library that I will call Finch in this email. I will be
unavailable for the next 3 weeks, but will work on code in my spare
time. When I get back, I will send a link to whatever I come up with.
Here is my
11 matches
Mail list logo
