Re: [Fink-devel] Proposed policy change for -pm packages

2004-04-12 Thread David R. Morrison
On February 29, I sent a message proposing a policy change for -pm packages. I'll reproduce it below, and then give some important updates. There was no objection earlier; if anybody has objections to this policy change, this is the time to state them! Dear fink developers, Last spring,

Re: [Fink-devel] Proposed policy change for -pm packages

2004-04-12 Thread Benjamin Reed
David R. Morrison wrote: One implication of having versioned packages is possible conflicts among them involving files in /sw/bin or /sw/share/man. My solution to this for now has been to allow the various versions to replace each other, with the understanding that this replacement is only going

Re: [Fink-devel] Proposed policy change for -pm packages

2004-04-12 Thread David R. Morrison
P.S. In my new policy statement where we eliminate placeholder packages, I forgot to mention one exception: We will need to keep storable-pm as a placeholder package because of the role that it plays in bootstrapping. (Maybe some day, when we completely stop supporting 10.2, we can change this,