OK, thanks for the clarification. What do you suggest I list it as in
the package description?
Thanks!
On 23 Nov 2004, at 13:35, David R. Morrison wrote:
BSD-type licenses generally don't identify themselves as BSD.
The MIT X-license also counts as a BSD-type license, for example.
-- Dave
On
BSD.
On Nov 22, 2004, at 10:08 PM, Jeremy Higgs wrote:
OK, thanks for the clarification. What do you suggest I list it as in
the package description?
Thanks!
On 23 Nov 2004, at 13:35, David R. Morrison wrote:
BSD-type licenses generally don't identify themselves as BSD.
The MIT X-license also
BSD-type licenses generally don't identify themselves as BSD.
The MIT X-license also counts as a BSD-type license, for example.
-- Dave
On Nov 21, 2004, at 8:57 PM, Jeremy Higgs wrote:
On 22 Nov 2004, at 2:03, Benjamin Reed wrote:
Jeremy Higgs wrote:
Redistribution and use in source and binary
Hi everyone,
I've created a package for the SilverCity, which is used to provide
syntax highlighting for Trac (which I've made packages for... and have
yet to commit). However, I'm not sure how to classify the licence. The
licence is as follows:
SilverCity Library License
Jeremy Higgs wrote:
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
are met:
1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
2.
On 22 Nov 2004, at 2:03, Benjamin Reed wrote:
Jeremy Higgs wrote:
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
are met:
1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
notice, this list of
