[Fink-devel] Re: [fink-commits] dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/utils rpm.info,NONE,1.1 rpm.patch,NONE,1.1

2004-06-25 Thread Dave Vasilevsky
On Jun 23, 2004, at 9:38 AM, Jean-François Mertens wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/utils In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv408 Added Files: rpm.info rpm.patch Log Message: from 10.2-gcc3.3 I just got a bug report about this package in

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [fink-commits] dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/utils rpm.info,NONE,1.1 rpm.patch,NONE,1.1

2004-06-25 Thread David R. Morrison
Dave, I have alternate suggestions for both situations you mention. First, there is a big project by some of us to rescue the remaining 300-400 packages which never moved from 10.2 to 10.3. Ben Hines set up this nice comparison chart at http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/compare.php which all

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [fink-commits] dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/utils rpm.info,NONE,1.1 rpm.patch,NONE,1.1

2004-06-25 Thread David R. Morrison
Hmmm... On second thought, maybe it wouldn't be so hard to modify what happens when we check something in, so that the commit message is mailed directly to the maintainer as well as to fink-commits (automatically). Would that help? -- Dave

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [fink-commits] dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/utils rpm.info,NONE,1.1 rpm.patch,NONE,1.1

2004-06-25 Thread Daniel Macks
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 08:13:54PM -0400, David R. Morrison wrote: So I guess my suggestion for the second problem would be: when you are going to revise one of your packages, you should probably start with the CVS current version rather than a local copy. Whenever I try to commit