On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Max Horn wrote:
At 10:22 Uhr -0400 17.04.2002, Chris Devers wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Max Horn wrote:
the following packages have a Restrictive license:
What is the working definition of restrictive? Non-GPL? Non-Berkeley?
(Arguably, GPL is much more restrictive
At 15:05 Uhr -0400 17.04.2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
Concerning revtex, I have been unable to find any discussion of licensing
either within the download or on the web site. I assume that not distributing
the binary would then be the default option.
Indeed. Maybe somebody can contact them,
