Re: [Fink-devel] binary release plans
OK... How come they aren't compliant? Sorry I haven't been keeping up... I've started full-time work experience, and have uni starting next week on top of that, so I've been very pre-occupied! Since gramps seems to work fine, I can move gnome-python2 to stable... But I still don't get the issue with gnome-python? There are already -py22 and -py23 packages for it... On 28 Feb 2004, at 13:08, Ben Hines wrote: gnome-python and hence, gramps need to be removed from stable since they aren't compliant with the python policy. The versions in unstable; gramps, gnome-python2, pytgtk2-py23, pygtk2-py22 need to be moved to stable. I have good reports from gramps users which depends heavily on the pygtk and gnome-python2, but no response from maintainers at all. -Ben On Feb 27, 2004, at 6:47 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: I plan to start creating a binary release for 10.3 in about a week. If you are aware of any of your packages in the 10.3/stable tree which are *not* suitable for binary release, please either fix them or remove them from that tree. Thanks, Dave --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] binary release plans
On 29 Feb 2004, at 9:29, David R. Morrison wrote: Jeremy Higgs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK... How come they aren't compliant? Sorry I haven't been keeping up... I've started full-time work experience, and have uni starting next week on top of that, so I've been very pre-occupied! Since gramps seems to work fine, I can move gnome-python2 to stable... But I still don't get the issue with gnome-python? There are already -py22 and -py23 packages for it... We seem to have the following packages at present: gnome-python (stable in both 10.2-gcc3.3 and 10.3) gnome-python-py22 (only present in 10.2-gcc3.3/unstable) gnome-python-py23 (only present in 10.2-gcc3.3/unstable) gnome-python2-py23 (only present in 10.3/unstable) I think Ben's point was that the gnome-python package needs to be removed, but this cannot be done until the gnome-python-py2x packages go to stable. Moving gnome-python2-py23 to stable, if it's ready, sounds good to me. Can the other -py2x packages go to stable as well? And do they work on 10.3? -- Dave Ahhh OK. What happened to the gnome-python-py2* packages ibn 10.3/unstable? I was certain there were some in there... --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] binary release plans
On Feb 28, 2004, at 4:34 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote: OK... How come they aren't compliant? Sorry I haven't been keeping up... I've started full-time work experience, and have uni starting next week on top of that, so I've been very pre-occupied! Since gramps seems to work fine, I can move gnome-python2 to stable... But I still don't get the issue with gnome-python? There are already -py22 and -py23 packages for it... No, there are not... not in 10.3 tree. Those are only in the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/gnome-python-py22 http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/gnome-python-py23 Any python package which doesn't comply is by definition unstable.. they can easily break. -Ben --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] binary release plans
I plan to start creating a binary release for 10.3 in about a week. If you are aware of any of your packages in the 10.3/stable tree which are *not* suitable for binary release, please either fix them or remove them from that tree. Thanks, Dave --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] binary release plans
David R. Morrison wrote: I plan to start creating a binary release for 10.3 in about a week. If you are aware of any of your packages in the 10.3/stable tree which are *not* suitable for binary release, please either fix them or remove them from that tree. And what I would have said the first time, if I hadn't got overexcited, is that gnucash is in the stable tree, but needs some adjustments to make apt-get not install perl560-core. I'll get to that this weekend, deadlines are good sometimes :) Thanks again, Peter -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] binary release plans
Hi Dave, On Feb 27, 2004, at 6:47 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: I plan to start creating a binary release for 10.3 in about a week. If you are aware of any of your packages in the 10.3/stable tree which are *not* suitable for binary release, please either fix them or remove them from that tree. I just made a grep on dlcompat in 10.3/stable and there are many packages still depending on it. Shall we remove these dependencies before making a binary dist? Cheers, Remi - Intelligence is like a four-wheel drive vehicle: it allows you to get stuck in much more remote places. * Remigius K. Mommsen e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of California, Irvine URL:http://cern.ch/mommsen c/o SLAC voice:++1 (650) 926-3595 2575 Sand Hill Road #35fax:++1 (650) 926-3882 Menlo Park, CA 94025, US home:++1 (650) 233-9041 * --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] binary release plans
Hi Remi. Sure, removing the dlcompat dependencies is one of the things which needs to be done. In some cases, this has already been done in the unstable tree, but not the stable tree. So it's a bit unclear whether one should create a new stable version, or move the current unstable version to stable. That's one of the reasons I keep asking maintainers to take a look at their stable packages. -- Dave --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] binary release plans
The xfree86-base package and friends are not in the 10.3 tree at all (which is how things will stay). In the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree, it seems we have version -16 in stable and version -18 in unstable. Does -18 fix the problem you mention? Should it be moved to stable? -- Dave From: Alexander K. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Fink-devel] binary release plans To: Fink-Developer devel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:24:03 -0500 Since this has been a major topic on the mailing lists, the 4.2.1.1 XFree86 packages: xfree86-base | rootless-(threaded)-(shlibs) don't work on Panther and should be excluded from the Panther bindist. Also, it appears that they can overwrite an external X11 installation--there have been quite a few problems with users having one of these packages as well as system-xfree86, so this should be fixed for the Jaguar bindist. On Feb 27, 2004, at 9:47 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: I plan to start creating a binary release for 10.3 in about a week. If you are aware of any of your packages in the 10.3/stable tree which are *not* suitable for binary release, please either fix them or remove them from that tree. Thanks, Dave --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel -- Alexander K. Hansen Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center Levitated Dipole Experiment 175 Albany Street, NW17-219 Cambridge, MA 02139-4213 --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] binary release plans
gnome-python and hence, gramps need to be removed from stable since they aren't compliant with the python policy. The versions in unstable; gramps, gnome-python2, pytgtk2-py23, pygtk2-py22 need to be moved to stable. I have good reports from gramps users which depends heavily on the pygtk and gnome-python2, but no response from maintainers at all. -Ben On Feb 27, 2004, at 6:47 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: I plan to start creating a binary release for 10.3 in about a week. If you are aware of any of your packages in the 10.3/stable tree which are *not* suitable for binary release, please either fix them or remove them from that tree. Thanks, Dave --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
