Re: [Fink-devel] tamperproof debs

2002-04-04 Thread Jeremy Higgs
On 4/4/02 10:28 PM, "Max Horn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 8:31 Uhr -0500 03.04.2002, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Is there any way of signing the deb files in the bin dist to make >> sure they were make by an authorized developer? Is this

Re: [Fink-devel] tamperproof debs

2002-04-04 Thread Jeremy Higgs
On 4/4/02 11:31 PM, "Chris Zubrzycki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thursday, April 4, 2002, at 07:28 AM, Max Horn wrote: > >> At 8:31 Uhr -0500 03.04.2002, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >

Re: [Fink-devel] tamperproof debs

2002-04-04 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, April 4, 2002, at 07:28 AM, Max Horn wrote: > At 8:31 Uhr -0500 03.04.2002, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Is there any way of signing the deb files in the bin dist to make sure >> they

Re: [Fink-devel] tamperproof debs

2002-04-04 Thread Max Horn
At 8:31 Uhr -0500 03.04.2002, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >Is there any way of signing the deb files in the bin dist to make >sure they were make by an authorized developer? Is this in the plan >for the future? I remember reading that debian maintaine

[Fink-devel] tamperproof debs

2002-04-03 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is there any way of signing the deb files in the bin dist to make sure they were make by an authorized developer? Is this in the plan for the future? I remember reading that debian maintainers signs thier packages. just a thought. - -chris zubrzyc