For me, the new readline-shlibs has worked quite fine for some time
now. Can others confirm this? If yes, it should be moved ASAP to
stable since other packages are pending simple because they now
depend on readline-shlibs...
Max
--
---
Max Horn
Do agree, and is working fine for me.
Matt
On Monday, March 18, 2002, at 12:39 AM, Max Horn wrote:
For me, the new readline-shlibs has worked quite fine for some time
now. Can others confirm this? If yes, it should be moved ASAP to stable
since other packages are pending simple because
If I understand correctly what the dpkg shlibs stuff will eventually do
for us, at some point in the future each fink package which provides
shared libraries will need to give some data about those libraries to
be used by the dpkg-shlibs system.
Max, will we put this directly in the .info file,
If the functionality of command history in python-2.2-8 is any
indication, readline-shlibs works very well indeed.
On Sunday, March 17, 2002, at 07:21 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
readline-shlibs works well for me also. I think it is ready to move.
-- Dave
At 10:47 Uhr -0500 17.03.2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
If I understand correctly what the dpkg shlibs stuff will eventually do
for us, at some point in the future each fink package which provides
shared libraries will need to give some data about those libraries to
be used by the dpkg-shlibs
OK, I just moved readline to stable, and also neon.
Now, what about db3 / db4 ? Can we move those? I had no problem
reports on them for a long time.
MAx
--
---
Max Horn
Software Developer
email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: (+49) 6151-494890
I plan to send out the following mail to fink-beginners, fink-user,
and fink-announce. Please tell me what you think of it, if should
forget the idea, or change something about it; you may also want to
suggest changes to the list of important package I gave (I tried to
keep it short, but
looks good to me, thought qt and bind9 should be added to the list IMHO.
But I think it's a good email to send like once week :P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I plan to send out the following mail to fink-beginners, fink-user,
and fink-announce. Please tell me what you think of it, if should
Max Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reason for bringing this up now is it would be good to start encouraging
people to provide this information in their packages, pretty soon. To
avoid fink validate problems, we might want to add one more field (Shlibs)
to the list of known fields right
Excellent idea, I'd include aalib and libmpeg as the gimp needs these
and samba as well.
Matt
On Monday, March 18, 2002, at 05:19 AM, Max Horn wrote:
I plan to send out the following mail to fink-beginners, fink-user, and
fink-announce. Please tell me what you think of it, if should forget
My point of view about the dependent packages is this: if a user tells us
that he/she is successfully using the latest version of package foo, then
we know that he/she is also successfully using at least some version of
everything that foo depends on (even if the user doesn't point that out
I fully agree with this, it hurts on one to have them but helps us
developpers in the mean time.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Someday, later, we will want to introduce Shlibs and start to use it.
If we are sure that this will be the name of the field, it would be nice
to have fink validate not
I changed some UI stuff in the GroupcChat preference dialog, the
french localization needs to be updated for that.
Also, it seems that GroupChat hasn't yet been localized to Spanish -
Cesar, can you do that, would be nice to have it for the near release.
Cheers,
Max
--
Dear Fink Developers,
I noticed that you were about to solicit feedback regarding unstable
packages so I decided to take a risk and enable the unstable directory via
/sw/etc/fink.conf and then upgrade all my packages (using source update as
of today). I am not entirely sure which of these are
Thanks for the feedback, to get the email address for the maintainer of
a particular package just type 'fink info packagename' :)
Matt
On Monday, March 18, 2002, at 01:23 PM, Aaron Seitz wrote:
(By the way it is hard to send messages about individual packages
directly
to the package
15 matches
Mail list logo
