[Fink-devel] system-foo packages

2002-04-13 Thread David R. Morrison
About six weeks ago I brought up the issue of making a system-ghostscript package (message reproduced below). Jeff objected (also reproduced below) but I would like to revisit the issue, because there is a forthcoming OzTeX CD which will have Gerben Wierda's teTeX/ghostscript installer on it, as

Re: [Fink-devel] to whomever owns /sw/bin/fink

2002-04-13 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
Randal == Randal L Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Randal The bleeding edge Perl rightfully notes that line 22 of /sw/bin/fink Randal is unportable, and should be replaced with: Randal require 5.6; Gah. Too early in the morning. require 5.006; Randal That suffices. --

Re: [Fink-devel] to whomever owns /sw/bin/fink

2002-04-13 Thread Max Horn
At 7:29 Uhr -0700 13.04.2002, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: Randal == Randal L Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Randal The bleeding edge Perl rightfully notes that line 22 of /sw/bin/fink Randal is unportable, and should be replaced with: Randal require 5.6; Gah. Too early in the

[Fink-devel] Xfree libs

2002-04-13 Thread Justin Hallett
I'm not sure but I think it needs the new dlcompat. I need this libs for a few port and they are always unsable. And for some reason this two libs are the only two that don't have dynamic libs only the a.out. Anyhow keep me posted. configure:8754: checking for XvShmCreateImage in -lXv

Re: [Fink-devel] Plans for 0.4.0 and future releases

2002-04-13 Thread Finlay Dobbie
On Saturday, April 6, 2002, at 12:43 PM, Max Horn wrote: I don't think it's that silly. Think about it. There has been at least one security hole in OS X (in NetInfo) in the past that could only be exploited by local users to gain root. On my box, that's only me, so almost no risk. On