At 11:45 Uhr -0600 19.05.2002, Jeff Whitaker wrote:
I've got an evolution-1.0.5 package working with SSL (aside from the
calendar, which is still broken). If it's OK with Max, I'll commit it
tommorrow.
Yeah that would suite me well. I just started work on that, too, but
if you have already
Max, you've become rather emotional over absolutely nothing. I think
it's clouding your judgement.
Max Horn wrote:
At 20:07 Uhr -0400 18.05.2002, Mark Rahner wrote:
Hi Max, I think you misunderstood some of what I was saying.
I've added comments inline below. -Mark
Max Horn wrote:
I
Mark,
As you have correctly pointed out, fink's evolution package is unusable.
Max has removed it so that others will not have to go through an experience
similar to yours.
Most of fink's packages are in fact usable. We're sorry that you had a
poor initial experience. If you have trouble with
Thanks. I've seen that you guys are extremely responsive, even Max,
when he's not being so defensive. You have nothing to apologize for.
Keep up the good work. I'll leave fink-devel alone now so that you can
get some work done. -Mark
David R. Morrison wrote:
Mark,
As you have correctly
At 17:03 Uhr -0400 19.05.2002, Mark Rahner wrote:
Max, you've become rather emotional over absolutely nothing. I
think it's clouding your judgement.
Uhm... yes? Thanks that you tell me, I wasn't aware I was emotional
about this :-) OK maybe a bit annoyed, since it seems we are
completly
On Sunday, May 19, 2002, at 01:07 AM, Mark Rahner wrote:
2) The tool chain for maintaining a bindist must be updated to support
bindist. It must be improved to allow easy use, and be made fool
proof (because everybody, that includes me, makes mistakes and it's
not so nice if that means
Mark:
Just to put this all in a bit of perspective: I understand that the Debian
project has around 700 developers. Fink has 20 core developers, plus
another 20-30 people who have made substantial contributions.
Apple offered some support to fink late last summer in the form of providing
