On Thursday, March 14, 2002, at 11:12 , Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
> Does anyone know where to get the current version of Oroborus? the link
> in the .info file seems to be bad.
I found a download link on this page:
http://netsw.org/x11/windowmanager/oroborus/
This is for oroborus2 which is in u
While trying to install LyX, the following happens when the mandatory
package xdvi
is fetched:
curl -f -L -s -S -O
ftp://ftp.math.berkeley.edu/pub/Software/TeX/xdvi-22.51.tar.gz
curl: (19) xdvi-22.51.tar.gz: No such file or directory.
### curl failed, exit code 19
Downloading the file "xdvi-22.
On Saturday, March 16, 2002, at 07:12 PM, Yoav Felberbaum wrote:
> Maybe a similar system could be used with Fink? It MAY cause hassle for
> those using shell scripts, but then these people shouldn't be using
> unstable for shell scripts as it's buggy OR it's in their interest to
> see that
I, too, have been lax when it comes to reporting stable software in
the unstable tree. I also have unstable added to my configuration.
I'll just say what I did if anyone wants to try this way, too. It was
a bit faster than going through the website, that's for sure. It
probably has missed a
A while ago, I installed ppower4 - and I have two comments:
1) when I first tried it, ppower4 didn't work because it actually requires
foiltex to be installed as well (the documentclass foils has to be
defined). So this is a dependency that should be added.
2) I use the newest MacOSX version of
On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Yoav Felberbaum wrote:
> At 15:17 -0800 16/3/02, Ben Hines wrote:
> >At 2:34 PM -0800 3/16/02, Adrian and Marie wrote:
> Maybe a similar system could be used with Fink? It MAY cause hassle
> for those using shell scripts, but then these people shouldn't be
> using unstabl
At 15:17 -0800 16/3/02, Ben Hines wrote:
>At 2:34 PM -0800 3/16/02, Adrian and Marie wrote:
>>Guilty. I am one of those people. I guess I'm stupid. I'd got
>>the idea in my head that unstable meant that they were unstable and
>>they were still a work in progress, rather than what seems to be
Ben Hines [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I think that is part of the problem. Some of the packages really are
> unstable, but i think most of them are more just needing to be
> tested. "testing" or "untested" would be a better name for the
> directory, probably.
Or maybe another option would be
At 2:34 PM -0800 3/16/02, Adrian and Marie wrote:
>Guilty. I am one of those people. I guess I'm stupid. I'd got the
>idea in my head that unstable meant that they were unstable and they
>were still a work in progress, rather than what seems to be the case
>which is, we believe it's stable a
Guilty. I am one of those people. I guess I'm stupid. I'd got the
idea in my head that unstable meant that they were unstable and they
were still a work in progress, rather than what seems to be the case
which is, we believe it's stable and would like feedback to confirm our
belief so that
I'm seeing funny behavior which lasts across invocations of multiple
programs that (I believe) use ncurses. It occurs in both xterm and
gnome-terminal with TERM=xterm, but disappears if I set TERM=vt100.
Here is an example: I start emacs, and somehow fill my screen with
text (C-h i, for example)
Type 'which install' and see where install is running from. Perhaps you have
a bad version somewhere. My install supports a -d switch and gives a
completely different usage screen.
Paul
On 2/18/02 6:42 PM, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> I updated from an earlier fi
On Friday, March 15, 2002, at 04:54 , David R. Morrison wrote:
> Any fvwm2 users out there? There is now a fink package for fvwm2-2.4.6
> in
> the unstable directory. (The latest one in stable is 2.4.3.) Would
> anybody
> like to try it out and let me know if it is OK so I can move to stabl
On Saturday, March 16, 2002, at 09:25 AM, Philip McDunnough wrote:
> I have Mozilla 9.8 running just fine under a variety of window
> managers. I updated to 9.9-1 but it won't start (I even deleted the
> .mozilla directory in my home to remove old settings). It simply states
> illegal instruc
Too many pkgs in unstable, currently submitting feedback as much as i
can. Have you considered some more structured feedback system that
would encourage more feedback? People are stupid, i bet there are
hundreds (who may not be on the lists!) using unstable fink pkgs who
don't realize they sho
I have Mozilla 9.8 running just fine under a variety of window managers.
I updated to 9.9-1 but it won't start (I even deleted the .mozilla
directory in my home to remove old settings). It simply states illegal
instruction and never starts. I removed it and reinstalled 9.8 which
works fine. Ha
16 matches
Mail list logo
