Try 'fink install aalib'
Matt
On Wednesday, March 27, 2002, at 05:09 PM, Basil John Gilger wrote:
Hi folks,
I ran fink update-all after a successful selfupdate. It failed with
the following:
...install -d -m 755 /sw/src/root-aalib-1.4rc4-5/sw/share/doc/aalib
install -c -p -m 644
Also what version of fink are you running 'fink --version' ???
Matt
On Wednesday, March 27, 2002, at 05:09 PM, Basil John Gilger wrote:
I am running Mac 10.1.3 on a PowerBook G4 with the Dec01 Development
tools and unstable fink.
___
Fink-users
no i finished it for him yesterday he need to just add it to the tracker
and have someone submit it for him.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think Chris Zubrzycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] is working on a minicom package.
¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·.,
Justin F. Hallett - Systems Analyst
I try to install dia with fink, but fink complains with package
libpng-shlibs was not found.
Any hints ?
Marc.
Complete output is:
--
[localhost:/sw] % fink install dia
sudo /sw/bin/fink install dia
Password:
Reading package info...
WARNING:
Le mercredi 27 mars 2002, à 05:07 PM, Alexander Hansen a écrit :
The split build problem strikes again. See my earlier post about
esound.
In any case, try installing libpng-shlibs directly ('fink install
libpng-shlibs') before installing dia.
fink install libpng-shlibs gives:
...
Better do a selfupdate--you may have to have fink version 0.9.9 to use the
packages with shared libraries now.
--
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
Levitated Dipole Experiment
MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center, 175 Albany Street, NW17-219
Cambridge, MA
Le mardi 26 mars 2002, à 03:14 PM, Jeff Whitaker a écrit :
Looks like you have a UFS filesystem - building XFree86 fails due to
file
corruption on UFS for some unknown reason. Try building it on an HFS+
partition.
Thanks a lot !
I have reformated my UFS partition to HFS an now
I love the concept of Mozilla though I often have trouble with the
browser.
I just updated Mozilla, which went smoothly and looked over their bug
database. I noticed that at some point there was a patch that someone
had for the default plugin downloader bug. (Presumably not enough to
solve the
I rebuilt all of the direct dependencies of mozilla (see my earlier
message) and then rebuilt mozilla. It now works intermittently: I
either get the 'Illegal instruction' error or the browser window actually
opens and seems OK.
Has anybody had better success than this?
--
Alexander K. Hansen
On Wednesday, March 27, 2002, at 11:32 AM, Marc Champesme wrote:
Le mardi 26 mars 2002, à 03:14 PM, Jeff Whitaker a écrit :
Looks like you have a UFS filesystem - building XFree86 fails due to file
corruption on UFS for some unknown reason. Try building it on an HFS+
partition.
Thanks a
Le mercredi 27 mars 2002, à 05:32 PM, Alexander Hansen a écrit :
Better do a selfupdate--you may have to have fink version 0.9.9 to use
the
packages with shared libraries now.
OK, but fink selfupdate doesn't update to 0.9.9 (the info file is in
unstable).
However I have copied the
Did you try 'fink install aalib', or 'fink install windowmaker', Let me
know how that goes, were the errors produced when you were doing 'fink
update-all'
Matt
On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 03:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the very same problem as Basil.
In my case:
fink
After installing compiled binary of nedit using apt-get I set the
following error message when I try to run nedit:
XmManager ClassInitialize: XmeTraitSet failed
Error: attempt to add non-widget child DropSiteManager to parent
nedit which supports only widgets
I am running XDarwin and Window
This is a problem with lesstfif and xfree4.2, has being fixed in cvs, do
a 'fink selfupdate' then 'fink install nedit'
Matt
On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 09:11 AM, Robert Detrick wrote:
After installing compiled binary of nedit using apt-get I set the
following error message when I try
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:49:29AM -0600, Rich Ramos wrote:
Does anyone have color working with the current version of mutt from the
binary dist?
mutt 1.2.5i-2
I would not recommend that version mutt, it has some security
problems. 1.3.27i is very good.
no I can't even get the window to open and i get no errors
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has anybody had better success than this?
¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·.,
Justin F. Hallett - Systems Analyst
Phone: (780)-408-3094
Fax: (780)-454-3200
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Zorro wrote:
no I can't even get the window to open and i get no errors
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has anybody had better success than this?
Doesn't seem to be getting a lot of attention
I guess no news is good news
I guess. I haven't been replying because I don't
it couldn't have unless some builddepends are missing but then you figure
it wouldn't work at all. but I've seen this since the 0.9.9 mozilla
update. 0.9.8 worked no version of revision of 0.9.9 has worked for me.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I guess. I haven't been replying because I don't have
18 matches
Mail list logo
