[Fink-users] Update-all Abiword problems

2002-05-03 Thread Adrian Simmons
Can't do an automated update from CVS right now because the abiword tarball appears to be non existent. The following 7 packages will be installed or updated: abiword lame lame-shlibs libxml2 libxml2-bin libxml2-shlibs mad The following 2 additional packages will be installed: mad-bin

[Fink-users] NOTICE: Download problems from prdownloads.sourceforge.net

2002-05-03 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Hi all, SourceForge.net has added some mirrors for prdownloads.sourceforge.net, and changed the way files are downloaded. At the moment this means that quite a few fink packages will fail to download. This is an issue which we know about and Max is working with the sourceforge team to resolve

Re: [Fink-users] NOTICE: Download problems

2002-05-03 Thread Zorro
If you find yourself unable to wait to install a package which has a source URL at prdownloads.sourceforge.net, don't worry, you can download the source code yourself. All you have to do is cd into /sw/src and then issue the same curl command you saw in the failed download phase, changing

Re: [Fink-users] April Developer Tools?

2002-05-03 Thread Jeff Whitaker
Alexander: I'm also having problems with the April 2002 DevTools - xfree86-rootless in particular won't compile. If you succeed in uninstalling the April tools, please let me know how you did it. -Jeff On Thu, 2 May 2002, Alexander Hansen wrote: I did a clean install of fink at about the

[Fink-users] broken sudoers

2002-05-03 Thread Dan O'Brien
Title: broken sudoers I've gone and broken my sudoers file, and can't sudo now. I opened it in BBedit to add the line: my username ALL = NOPASSWD: ALL but it now comes up with the message sudo: /etc/sudoers is mode 0640, should be 0440 Any idea what to do? -- Dan O'Brien The Dancing Ox Company

Re: [Fink-users] April Developer Tools?

2002-05-03 Thread Ben Hines
At 7:04 AM -0600 5/3/02, Jeff Whitaker wrote: Alexander: I'm also having problems with the April 2002 DevTools - xfree86-rootless in particular won't compile. If you succeed in uninstalling the April tools, please let me know how you did it. Are you sure the problem is the dev tools? What

Re: [Fink-users] April Developer Tools?

2002-05-03 Thread Jeff Whitaker
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Ben Hines wrote: Are you sure the problem is the dev tools? What are your errors? It's much more likely to be a fink problem. For example xfree86 won't download currently because prdownloads is hosed. Absolutely sure. Builds with Dec tools, not with April tools. Very

Re: [Fink-users] broken sudoers

2002-05-03 Thread Erik Price
On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 09:21 AM, Dan O'Brien wrote: I've gone and broken my sudoers file, and can't sudo now. I opened it in BBedit to add the line: my username  ALL = NOPASSWD: ALL but it now comes up with the message  sudo: /etc/sudoers is mode 0640, should be 0440 Any idea what

Re: [Fink-users] broken sudoers

2002-05-03 Thread Viktor Haag
Erik Price writes: On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 09:21 AM, Dan O'Brien wrote: I've gone and broken my sudoers file, and can't sudo now. I opened it in BBedit to add the line: my username  ALL = NOPASSWD: ALL but it now comes up with the message  sudo: /etc/sudoers is mode 0640,

[Fink-users] downloading applications

2002-05-03 Thread Dan O'Brien
I want to install Gimp and some other stuff, but my ISP cuts me off every two hours, interrupting my downloads. I have speed download, which allows me to resume browser downloads, so I was wondering if I could download my files through download accelerator via IE, and then put them

Re: [Fink-users] broken sudoers

2002-05-03 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 well, if you can't sudo, you must enable root, become root, and then chmod 0440 /etc/sudoers On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 09:21 AM, Dan O'Brien wrote: I've gone and broken my sudoers file, and can't sudo now. I opened it in BBedit to add

Re: [Fink-users] downloading applications

2002-05-03 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 yes, or if you like, install wget. I like wget much better than curl, it works with less problems. there is a -c option for it (curl has one too) which will continue the download from where it left off... On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 10:00 AM, Dan

Re: [Fink-users] downloading applications

2002-05-03 Thread Erik Price
On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 10:00 AM, Dan O'Brien wrote: I want to install Gimp and some other stuff, but my ISP cuts me off every two hours, interrupting my downloads. I have speed download, which allows me to resume browser downloads, so I was wondering if I could download my

Re: [Fink-users] downloading applications

2002-05-03 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 10:30 AM, Erik Price wrote: On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 10:00 AM, Dan O'Brien wrote: I want to install Gimp and some other stuff, but my ISP cuts me off every two hours, interrupting my downloads. I have speed

[Fink-users] dependencies

2002-05-03 Thread Koen van der Drift
Hi, Last night I did a fink update, and it installed a newer version of libxml2 (which is needed by daemonic which in turn is needed by anacron). Libxml2 is apparently expanding, because it now also depends on python, which in turn depends on quite some other packages. This all seems overkill

[Fink-users] Re: tar-1.13.19.tar.gz

2002-05-03 Thread edwin sutton waldmire iv
I apologize if this message is not of the proper caliber for this list. I am simply desperate and do not know where else to turn. I am trying to install Fink 0.4.0 on Darwin 1.4.1. When I run ./bootstrap.sh, I eventually get the following message: BOOTSTRAP PHASE ONE: download tarballs curl

Re: [Fink-users] Re: tar-1.13.19.tar.gz

2002-05-03 Thread Erik Price
On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 01:54 PM, edwin sutton waldmire iv wrote: I apologize if this message is not of the proper caliber for this list. I am simply desperate and do not know where else to turn. There is also a Fink-Beginner's List. You might find this helpful for future problems.

[Fink-users] pine-ssl build problem

2002-05-03 Thread Alexander Hansen
I can't seem to get pine-ssl to build, although pine builds OK. I found a suspicious line in my build process: Including LDAP functionality File /sw/etc/ssl/factory.pem is missing I verified that the file was indeed missing. If this file is indeed necessary, which package should have it?

Re: [Fink-users] pine-ssl build problem

2002-05-03 Thread Jeff Whitaker
Alexander: This line is a warning - I don't think it's the source of your problem. Where exactly does your build fail? What versions of openldap and openssl do you have installed? -Jeff On Fri, 3 May 2002, Alexander Hansen wrote: I can't seem to get pine-ssl to build, although pine builds

Re: [Fink-users] fink-selfupdate can't unpack tarball

2002-05-03 Thread Zorro
At 6:13 PM -0400 5/3/02, tom keyes wrote: Fink is going crazy on me. On fink-selfupdate I'm getting unpacking the tarball fink-09.11.tar.gz .failed Fink update-all is giving many warnings of Possible unterminated here-document The reason I started updating is I replaced xtools with

[Fink-users] graphftpweblog

2002-05-03 Thread Juan
I am trying sometime ago to use graphftpweblog since ftpweblog works so well (although is a pity ProFTPd is yet not there), I have installed from fink and directly from macosxgnu GD.pm but it seems to have a version incompatibility that I dont know how to avoid... See it below: %

[Fink-users] Nothing will install

2002-05-03 Thread macbishop
I have just made a fresh install of MacOS X 10.1.4 and the April Dev Tools. Then i installed the latest fink-binary. When i run 'fink list' everything look OK but when I try to install it all goes down the drain. This is what I get: [c213-100-32-76:~] bishop% fink install xfree86-rootles sudo

[Fink-users] Make NetHack Use Graphics?

2002-05-03 Thread Grant Barrett
I see one indirect mention of this in the archives, but no response. I use CVS and the unstable trees, so I stay a right on the bleeding edge. The last time Nethack was updated, it stopped using the X graphical interface. Now, far be it from me to upset decades of traditon for those who respect

Re: [Fink-users] Nothing will install

2002-05-03 Thread Alexander Strange
On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 10:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [c213-100-32-76:~] bishop% fink install xfree86-rootles It's 'xfree86-rootless' :) curl -f -L -s -S -O http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/fink/dlcompat-20020413.tar.gz prdownloads is temporarily broken. Download the file via IE

Re: [Fink-users] Nothing will install

2002-05-03 Thread Chris Devers
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Alexander Strange wrote: On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 10:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [c213-100-32-76:~] bishop% fink install xfree86-rootles It's 'xfree86-rootless' :) Yes. The Rutles were a Beatles parody with Eric Idle :) -- Chris Devers

Re: [Fink-users] fink-selfupdate can't unpack tarball

2002-05-03 Thread Chris Devers
On 3 May 2002, tom keyes wrote: Fink is going crazy on me. On fink-selfupdate I'm getting unpacking the tarball fink-09.11.tar.gz .failed Fink update-all is giving many warnings of Possible unterminated here-document Is it me, or are *a lot* of people getting bugs like this lately?

Re: [Fink-users] fink-selfupdate can't unpack tarball

2002-05-03 Thread Alexander Strange
On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 11:59 PM, Chris Devers wrote: I'm sorry that I don't have any, but I've got a feeling that a lot of people hare seeing different versions of the same problem that you are. As far as I've noticed, no clear explanation or remedy has emerged yet, but I would be very