Ok, so I went ahead and built the threaded version of X, but now I have a
question. Is it possible to use OroborOSX with the threaded X? It starts
up just fine, so I guess the real question is: Will it take advantage of
the threaded nature of X, since OroborOSX contains its own version of the
On Friday, November 15, 2002, at 09:49 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
I apologize for the size of this list, but it's much easier for me to
post what I know works than to send 206 messages the maintainers.
i aalib 1.4rc5-2 Ascii art library
i aalib-bin 1.4rc5-2 Ascii art library
i aalib-shlibs
Hi
I notice that aria package which was in 10.1 list is no longer in 10.2 list.
Is there any plan to include this useful web download tool back in 10.2
package list ?
In the mean time, is there any other similar tools that i can use in 10.2.2
?
Thanks for your information.
Best Regards
Jim
To clarify, i don't think we want everyone sending their lists of
installed apps to the fink lists. We do need people to test basic
functionality, not just compile things. We need to know if it works. We
know everything compiles already. And such mails are not really
appropriate for the lists.
On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 01:01 AM, Brian Lenihan wrote:
i efax 0.9a-001114-1 Simple FAX utility
efax is an example of why you should send individual messages and not
just blindly send lists of compiled apps. I almost know for certain
that this does not work. Have you actually
Dear Ken,
You were right on target! I had forgotten to source /sw/bin/init.csh
after
updating to 10.2 (fink still sort of worked because I had manually added
/sw/bin to my path). As to the v-string thing, it's still there, but
doesn't seem
to interfere with anything. The lines it refers to are
On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 01:26 am, Ben Hines wrote:
Yes, it is still incomplete. Stuff like pthread_cancel() doesn't even
work.
I've just tested 'pthread_cancel', and you're quite right. I really
expected this was going to be fixed in 10.2.
Alwyn
Hi,
I'll try and wrap up the situation with octave/octave-forge:
Presently, installing octave via fink will give you octave-2.1.35
compiled with gcc2.95.
The octave-forge package I submitted to the tracker some time ago
should work if you make sure that the gcc2 flag is set (I don't know
the
On Samstag, November 16, 2002, at 10:01 Uhr, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 21:49:47 -0800
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Ben Hines [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Fink-users] Fink Needs You
If you are using any fink package on 10.2 that is not
Hi,
% fink --version
Package manager version: 0.11.0
Distribution version: 0.4.9.cvs
I have a problem with fink update-all :
% fink update-all
sudo /sw/bin/fink update-all
Information about 1757 packages read in 7 seconds.
Failed: Internal error: node for xfree86-rootless already exists
It
On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 06:44 AM, Artemio Gonzalez-Lopez
wrote:
I am using perl 5.8, not the perl that comes with 10.2, though the
problem
persists when I go back to the system's perl. Go figure!
When switching to Perl 5.8, did you follow the procedure outlined in
this message:
On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 01:46 PM, Alexander Meier wrote:
hi,
please have a look at the following problem... I've had this problem
before - but forgot how I solved it then!
maybe this will help you remember
http://www.mail-archive.com/fink-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00288.html
--
Hi,
There's a problem with the Aria package compiling on 10.2.x ... I'll
have a look at it, but I'm not sure how to do it right now.
On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 08:52 PM, Jim Kuo wrote:
Hi
I notice that aria package which was in 10.1 list is no longer in 10.2
list. Is there any plan to
I noticed on the register this morning a report that stated that libpcap sources had been infected with a trojan. They include MD5 checksums for the altered and unaltered sources for double checking. What is the status on the MD5 checksum for fink -- did it have the right checksum. This site
In reference to my earlier note, it would appear that fink is not
immediately in trouble as my copy of libpcap is libpcap-0.6.2-6.info as
opposed to the infected version 0.7.1. I also scanned the sources for
the URL that the Houston group posted and didn't find them. This is
something to be
On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 02:31 AM, Ben Hines wrote:
On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 01:01 AM, Brian Lenihan wrote:
i efax 0.9a-001114-1 Simple FAX utility
efax is an example of why you should send individual messages and not
just blindly send lists of compiled apps. I
16 matches
Mail list logo
